MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2036684247 · doi:10.2118/2007-133-ea

Incorporation of Heat in the VAPEX Process: Warm VAPEX

2007· article· en· W2036684247 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMathematics
ThématiqueGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProcess (computing)ThermodynamicsMechanicsPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Warm VAPEX, as one of the variations of vapor extraction process, is investigated in the current research which incorporates heat in a VAPEX process. The idea behind it is to heat the solvent above the dew point temperature of solvent vapors at reservoir conditions and inject it to the reservoir. The superheated vapors carry some sensible heat to the solvent- heavy oil interface and also cause an additional driving force due to mixing, when the solvent vapor condenses at the pore scale. The experiments have been conducted in a rectangular packed glass-bead model. Superheated n-pentane was injected to the model at elevated temperatures, above the model temperature. The model was insulated to lower the potential for heat loss to surrounding and a so-called dummy experiment was conducted to find out the rate of pentane condensation in the system due to heat losses. The preliminary results show the promising feature of warm VAPEX process in terms of enhanced oil production rates. Introduction The vapor extraction (VAPEX) process has recently drawn lots of attention for the recovery of heavy oil. The increasing trend in the energy costs along with great concerns regarding the environmental aspects, global warming, specifically, have provided the opportunity for applying this process for heavy oil recovery, greater than ever. However, the process suffers from an inherent drawback; it is slow in production rate. Creative efforts have resulted in developing several variations of VAPEX with higher production rates than the conventional process, one of which to incorporate heat in the VAPEX process. The idea of using solvent vapors for the recovery of heavy oil was introduced in 1974 [1]. However, unattractive production rates prevented the idea to be tested in the field. A decade after, VAPEX, was introduced as a variation of steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), which utilized the horizontal well technology [2]. However, the process was still slow in terms of oil production rate. Several researchers investigated the incorporation of heat in a VAPEX process in order to improve the diffusion-controlled process. Co-injection of solvent and steam/hot water, so-called hybrid VAPEX process, was investigated by several researchers, as a novel approach to VAPEX [3–8]. The steam alternating solvent (SAS) was also studied as a variation of "huff n puff" process, utilizing solvent in cycles along with steam [1, 9]. Near the well bore, electrical heating is also utilized to create a limited hot temperature region during VAPEX process, to recycle the solvent in-situ [10]. Overall, the effect of heat in VAPEX process was found to be promising in terms of comparable oil production rates and decreased energy requirements when compared to thermal oil recovery methods. Warm VAPEX Experiment The experiments for the investigation of warm VAPEX process were conducted in a rectangular packed model. Fig. 1 shows a schematic of the experimental setup used. Liquid n-pentane was pumped at constant flow rate and passed through a tube, wrapped by heating tape. The power of heating tape was adjusted to obtain the desire temperature of injecting solvent vapor at the injection point.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,223
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle