MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2036765686 · doi:10.1002/dat.20114

Experience from both sides: A PD nurse as a PD patient

2007· article· en· W2036765686 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos

Notice bibliographique

RevueDialysis & Transplantation · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePeritoneal dialysisDialysisHemodialysisContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisKidney diseaseNursingFeelingHome hemodialysisIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicinePsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

During a recent trip to Hungary I was happy to meet Bátor Bálintné (“Gizike”), a pleasant 36-year-old nurse at a dialysis unit in Győr, a city 80 miles outside of Budapest. She was introduced to me as the peritoneal dialysis nurse. I never imagined that I was also talking to a patient undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Gizike started her nursing career in a hospital trauma center. Following this, she worked as a public health nurse until she developed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and required dialysis. She had chronic renal failure due to chronic pyelonephritis that had started at age 9; it advanced to ESRD in 2004. She had accepted her chronic kidney disease and was prepared psychologically when she was told that she had to start dialysis. She describes the initiation of dialysis as a turning point in her life and thinks that her decision to go on dialysis was made easier because she had already accepted her chronic illness. Gizike had a choice of either CAPD or hemodialysis (HD). She chose CAPD, primarily because of the freedom and independence it promised her. After initiating peritoneal dialysis (PD), and considering her nursing background and devotion to the PD modality, her unit's administration thought she would make an ideal PD nurse, an invitation she happily accepted. The patients accepted her fully knowing that, as a patient on CAPD herself, she fully understood the trying nature of living with ESRD and undergoing dialysis. When teaching patients, especially new ones, she relies on her first-hand experience to give them advice about how to accept their condition and the new treatment. She talks to them about the various aspects of HD and PD and, on at least two occasions, was able to convince HD patients to switch to CAPD. She was introduced to me as the peritoneal dialysis nurse. I never imagined that I was also talking to a patient undergoing CAPD. As both a dialysis nurse and patient, she is in an excellent position to help other patients faced with the trauma of starting dialysis. She believes it is easier for her to be compassionate with patients because she shares their circumstances. She approaches them not only as a nurse but also as a fellow patient, and sees herself as a companion on their life's journey while giving them spiritual support. She often holds their hands while she comforts them, especially because she knows what is going on inside them, and helps them to bear their burdens. I asked her what advice she gives other CAPD patients. She tells them “not to give up and to follow their medical instructions. With CAPD [you] can live a pleasant and productive life.” I left Hungary most impressed and inspired by the grace and enthusiasm of this young lady. I thank Gizike for being who she is and wish her the best in her life's journey. The author is a nephrologist with Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. He is also a member of D&T's Editorial Advisory Board. Do you have a memorable patient experience you'd like to share? D&T wants to hear from you! E-mail the editor at skuehne@wiley.com.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,032

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,018
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0200,008
Communication savante0,0110,011
Science ouverte0,0030,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,022
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDialysis & TransplantationMême sujetDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementTravaux en français237 207