Beyond noise power in 3D computed tomography: The local NPS and off‐diagonal elements of the Fourier domain covariance matrix
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation and stationarity of noise in volumetric computed tomography (CT) using the local discrete noise-power spectrum (NPS) and off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix of the discrete Fourier transform of noise-only images (denoted Σ(DFT)). Experimental conditions were varied to affect noise correlation and stationarity, the effects were quantified in terms of the NPS and Σ(DFT), and practical considerations in CT performance characterization were identified. METHODS: Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images were acquired using a benchtop system comprising an x-ray tube and flat-panel detector for a range of acquisition techniques (e.g., dose and x-ray scatter) and three phantom configurations hypothesized to impart distinct effects on the NPS and Σ(DFT): (A) air, (B) a 20-cm-diameter water cylinder with a bowtie filter, and (C) the cylinder without a bowtie filter. The NPS and off-diagonal elements of the Σ(DFT) were analyzed as a function of position within the reconstructions. RESULTS: The local NPS varied systematically throughout the axial plane in a manner consistent with changes in fluence transmitted to the detector and view sampling effects. Variability in fluence was manifest in the NPS magnitude-e.g., a factor of ~2 variation in NPS magnitude within the axial plane for case C (cylinder without bowtie), compared to nearly constant NPS magnitude for case B (bowtie filter matched to the cylinder). View sampling effects were most prominent in case A (air) where the variance increased at greater distance from the center of reconstruction and in case C (cylinder) where the NPS exhibited correlations in the radial direction. The effects of detector lag were observed as azimuthal correlation. The cylinder (without bowtie) had the strongest nonstationarity because of the larger variability in fluence transmitted to the detector. The diagonal elements of the Σ(DFT) were equivalent to the NPS estimated from the periodogram, and the average off-diagonal elements of the Σ(DFT) exhibited amplitude of ~1% of the NPS for the experimental conditions investigated. Furthermore, the off-diagonal elements demonstrated fairly long tails of nearly constant amplitude, with magnitude somewhat reduced for experimental conditions associated with greater stationarity (viz., lower Σ(DFT) tails for cases A and B in comparison to case C). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric CT exhibits nonstationarity in the NPS as hypothesized in relation to fluence uniformity and view sampling. Measurement of the NPS should seek to minimize such changes in noise correlations and include careful reporting of experimental conditions (e.g., phantom design and use of a bowtie filter) and spatial dependence (e.g., analysis at fixed radius within a phantom). Off-diagonal elements of the Σ(DFT) similarly depend on experimental conditions and can be readily computed from the same data as the NPS. This work begins to check assumptions in NPS analysis examine the extent to which NPS is an appropriate descriptor of noise correlations, and investigate the magnitude of off-diagonal elements of the Σ(DFT). While the magnitude of such off-diagonal elements appears to be low, their cumulative effect on space-variant detectability remains to be investigated-e.g., using task-specific figures of merit.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».