MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2037142799 · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03009.x

Tourette syndrome, ADHD, and the limbic system: investigating the pathophysiology

2008· letter· en· W2037142799 sur OpenAlexaff
Peter Sörös

Notice bibliographique

RevueDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology · 2008
Typeletter
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAmygdalaPsychologyTourette syndromeLimbic systemNeuroscienceSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PathophysiologyMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderPsychiatryMedicineCentral nervous systemInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

See related article on page 524 The pathophysiology of Tourette syndrome (TS) is not well understood. Multiple converging lines of evidence point to a functional impairment of the cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuitry. Based on close functional and anatomical connections between the prefrontal cortical and the ventral striatal portions of this network, and the limbic system, it has been hypothesized that the amygdala play an important role in the pathophysiology of TS.1 The study by Ludolph et al. in this issue tested the hypothesis that amygdala volumes are significantly different between individuals with TS and an age-matched comparison group of healthy children using volumetric, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This technique has been used successfully to study the anatomical correlates of neurological and psychiatric disorders as diverse as schizophrenia, dyslexia, and epilepsy. Still, volumetric MRI is challenging, in particular due to difficulties in reliably delineating the brain structures under investigation. Ludolph et al. compared amygdala volumes between a small but well-characterized and relatively homogeneous sample of patients with TS (17 young males, age 9–16y), and age-matched, healthy individuals. A considerable portion of the TS group (8/17 males) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) according to DSMV-IV criteria. The authors found significantly smaller amygdala volumes, standardized to total brain volume, in patients with TS compared with the healthy group. However, amygdala volumes were not correlated with tic severity, the leading symptom of TS. In contrast, the authors found significant correlations between amygdala volumes and behavioural impairment and symptoms of ADHD. Very recently, another study used volumetric MRI to test the hypothesis that TS is associated with alterations of amygdala volume and morphology.2 The studies by Ludolph et al. and Peterson et al.2 appear to point in different directions. While Ludolph et al. found smaller amygdala volumes in patients with TS and an association between amygdala volumes and ADHD symptoms, Peterson et al. observed larger amygdala volumes in patients with TS without association with ADHD comorbidity.2 These divergent results are difficult to interpret based on the existing data and might be due, at least in part, to differences in the distribution of age and sex in the two available studies. The findings of both studies generate a wealth of new questions that stimulates further research on the pathophysiology of TS. What are the next steps that might increase our understanding of the presumably complex pathophysiology of this disorder? First, researchers might want to study whether morphological changes are confined to the amygdala or also found in other parts of the limbic system, such as the anterior cingulate cortex. The study of Peterson et al. already investigated structural abnormalities of the hippocampus and found larger hippocampus volumes in patients with TS.2 The anterior cingulate cortex might be, at least in theory, a crucial area for the generation of TS symptoms, as it is an interface between motor initiation and programming, emotional processing, and cognitive function. Additional volumetric MRI studies in homogeneous patient samples might also help to integrate the divergent findings that were presented in the two published studies on amygdala volumes in TS. Second, we would like to know whether morphological alterations in the amygdala (and presumably other limbic areas) are a causal factor for the development of TS or, rather, the consequence of changes in brain function in TS. The cross-sectional data available today do not provide an answer. Given the long interval between tic onset and MRI (2–5y in the study by Ludolph et al.), the reported structural alterations might represent plastic changes, secondary to changes in neural networks and neurotransmitter release. Longitudinal volumetric studies, although difficult and expensive, with a first scan shortly after symptom onset and a second scan years later, might help to establish the relationship between structural changes of the limbic system and TS. Third, the functional significance of the observed morphological changes in the amygdala has to be determined. Human brain function can be studied non-invasively with functional MRI (fMRI). fMRI detects changes of blood oxygenation related to sensory stimulation, motor tasks, and cognitive processing, which are closely related to the underlying neural activity.3 fMRI has been successfully used to study emotional processing in the amygdala in healthy individuals and in patients, and will certainly be helpful for the study of limbic function in patients with TS.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,195
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,006
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDevelopmental Medicine & Child NeurologyMême sujetObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersTravaux en français237 207