The reproducible acquisition of comparative liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry data from complex biological samples
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An in-depth study of the reproducibility of data acquired for comparative proteomics analysis using a prototype two-stage heated laminar flow chamber fitted to a commercial high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) instrument was undertaken. The study is based on 24 replicate samples from four independent membrane preparations derived from two matched breast cancer cell lines. Variation and reproducibility in the data were evaluated at several levels highlighting the relative efficiency and variability of the acquisition routines used. Specifically, variation in the number and relative intensities of chromatographic peaks eluted from the LC column, precursor ion selection and sequence identification were evaluated. On average, approximately 6500 chromatographic peaks were generated for each acquisition with a corresponding coefficient of variance (CV) of less than 20%. Precursor ion selection and sequence identification averaged 1380 and 780 events per acquisition sample, respectively, with corresponding CVs of less than 10% for each. The reproducibility in the precursor ion selection was typically better than 60% between similar replicates. Using protein and peptide internal standards, it was found that the CV in retention time across the gradient between two acquisition pairs was typically less than 5%, whereas the average intensity ratio was 1.0 (expected) with a CV approaching 20%. An evaluation of the intensity ratios calculated from endogenous peptide sequences, identified across the acquisition set, indicated a CV of approximately 30%. Similarly, the CV associated with the top 1000 peptides indicated a mean and median of 28.4 and 26.95%. For a given acquisition pair it was also found that approximately 11% of the chromatographic peaks eluting from the column were linked to a sequence or identified. For these experiments, less than 10% of the peak pairs had absolute ratios greater than 2.0 and of those only approximately 10% had sequences linked to them. For each matched acquisition set on average 406 proteins were identified with a CV of less than 10%. Of the proteins that were identified approximately 30% had at least one predicted trans-membrane domain, indicating a four-fold increase over a crude homogenate sample with only minor enrichment. During these experiments it was found that the interface did not significantly alter the relative charge state distribution of ions, nor did it introduce significant interference from background ions. The interface was capable of 24-hour acquisition cycles.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».