MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2037284924 · doi:10.1176/pn.47.8.psychnews_47_8_1-b

Fewer U.S. Grads Matching in Psychiatry

2012· article· en· W2037284924 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Moran

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiversity and Career in Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWorkforceMedical schoolMedical educationPsychologyFamily medicineMatching (statistics)MedicinePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Professional NewsFull AccessFewer U.S. Grads Matching in PsychiatryMark MoranMark MoranPublished Online:20 Apr 2012https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.47.8.psychnews_47_8_1-bAbstractA total of 616 senior medical students graduating from U.S. medical schools are entering psychiatry residency programs this year, a drop from 640 last year and 670 in 2010.Those 616 seniors represent 3.9 percent of graduating seniors, the lowest percentage of U.S. allopathic medical student seniors to enter general psychiatry residencies in six years.According to the National Resident Matching Program, 1,096 positions were filled in psychiatry residency programs this year out of 1,118 offered. As in past years, positions not filled by U.S. graduating seniors were filled by international medical graduates (including U.S. and non-U.S. citizens), Canadian students, graduates of osteopathic schools, and students who graduated from medical school in previous years. The annual "match," in which the choices of graduating medical students are paired with those of residency programs, is typically watched as an indicator of workforce size and makeup of the various medical specialties for the coming years.Figures for psychiatry in recent years have fluctuated slightly (see chart), but the downward trend and the fall-off this year have some psychiatric leaders and educators concerned about psychiatry's professional identity and how it is being presented to young medical students. Several leaders have emphasized especially that the clerkship experience that medical students receive in psychiatry is inadequate to convey what is attractive about practicing the profession."We need to reach out to medical students in more effective ways than simply exposing them to a four-week clerkship on an inpatient unit, with no follow-up of the patients they have cared for," said APA President John Oldham, M.D. "Establishing and maintaining ongoing relationships with patients is one of the key factors that make psychiatry such a fulfilling career."Oldham said that students need to get a taste of what it is like to get to know their patients and follow their progress over time, especially now, when psychiatric treatments are more effective than ever.Oldham's remarks about clerkships were echoed by Sidney Weissman, M.D., a past APA trustee and past president of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training (AADPRT), who has maintained a long-time interest in workforce issues. "I am sure that a four-week clerkship on an inpatient unit where patients are medicated and discharged in a week, where neither the resident nor student has any follow up on the patient is not an effective learning experience for our discipline," he said. (For reactions from other AADPRT leaders and members, see What's Deterring Med Students From Psychiatry Careers.)Weissman has been concerned about how psychiatry defines and presents itself. "The picture of contemporary psychiatry is confusing to many of us and must be more confusing to our students," he said. "Until we restore clarity to what our discipline is and develop creative ways to communicate it in a few weeks of psychiatric clerkship to our medical students, I am concerned that recruitment will continue to decline."In a press release responding to the match results, APA Medical Director James H. Scully Jr., M.D., noted that there are currently about 50,000 psychiatrists in the United States, a number that is already inadequate to serve all the patients who need help, especially those in rural areas of the country. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, there are more than 3,500 Health Professional Shortage Areas for Mental Health, mostly in nonmetropolitan areas. Comprehensive statistics on this year's match are posted at www.nrmp.org. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,104
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,348

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1040,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetDiversity and Career in MedicineTravaux en français237 207