Master Musicians of India: Hereditary Sarangi Players Speak (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Master Musicians of India: Hereditary Sarangi Players Speak Margaret E. Walker (bio) Regula Burckhardt Qureshi. Master Musicians of India: Hereditary Sarangi Players Speak. Routledge. xxxvi, 328. US $100.00 Chief among the challenges of ethnomusicological writing today are questions of representation and voice, the accuracy of scholarly interpretations, and their distance from the lives of living practitioners. One of the solutions in recent decades has been the employment of dialogic processes, through which scholars share research with ‘insiders,’ soliciting opinions and feedback or even producing collaborative final products. In Master Musicians of India: Hereditary Sarangi Players Speak, eminent ethnomusicologist Regula Qureshi takes a unique approach to dialogic [End Page 347] presentation and thus contributes to a new paradigm for the publication of field research. Most recorded interviews and field notes remain in institutional or personal archives, drawn on for scholarly projects, but rarely made public. Qureshi has chosen, with permission and support from the musicians, to publish twenty-three translated and transcribed interviews from her own research. Organized in eleven chapters and enhanced by biographical and contextual information, the interviews offer strikingly intimate glimpses into the lives of ten ‘masters’ of the North Indian bowed instrument, the sarangi. Spanning a period of almost forty years, Qureshi’s interviews document the ongoing process of tradition and change among these artists, their disciples, and communities as her collaborators speak of their training, approaches to teaching, innovations, and a host of other subjects. Qureshi takes a broad approach to the term hereditary at times, including performers whose families have been professional musicians for only a few generations, but this increases the breadth of the data. The speakers range from Qureshi’s own teachers to other renowned artists, and she frames the book by beginning with her second Ustad, Sabri Khan of Delhi, and ending with her first Ustad, the late Hamid Husain of Lahore. This last chapter is a touching selection of excerpts from his memoir, which reach back into the 1800s, connecting globalized present with feudal past. One also learns about Qureshi, who candidly situates herself in the context of both lessons and conversations. In a personal voice that combines fond memories with scholarly reflexivity, she presents her own experiences candidly, frequently emphasizing her language proficiency and musical accomplishments, but also frankly drawing attention to occasional cultural errors she made in spite of her achieved insider status through her Indian husband and his family. Her expertise is clearly situated in the world of hereditary Muslim rather than Hindu performers, however, as a slip in the lineage of a Hindu dance family reveals. One of Qureshi’s primary aims in creating this work was to present the musicians’ words unmediated by scholarship in order to honour her ‘commitment to the individuals who make interpretation possible in the first place [and] to let them be heard on their own authority.’ Yet words are not always straightforward, and the acts of transcription and translation can easily shape meaning. Language is therefore an essential issue and approached with great insight here. The dialogues, for example, preserve a sense of the syntax of the original Urdu or Hindi nicely without becoming ungrammatical. There are occasional inconsistencies in the italics and parentheses used for contextual or descriptive interjections, but never to the point of causing confusion. I must admit to being distracted by the consistent spelling of all right as alright, but otherwise found metaphoric and linguistic concerns approached with intelligence and sensitivity. [End Page 348] All in all, Master Musicians of India is an immensely interesting and useful book that offers an intriguing framework for the presentation of research. The amount of raw, largely unmediated information is phenomenal, yet the intimate nature of the dialogues makes the book an easy read. The serious scholar will have to create his or her own index, as many gems of information in the text are not included in the index, but this is a feature of the presentation rather than a weakness. One is compelled to delve into and analyze the book as the archive it is, rather than skim through in search of salient quotes. The multiple approaches through which the text can be accessed and the...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».