MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2037559002 · doi:10.1353/lan.2000.0030

The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause. 2nd edn. By Simon C. Dik, and: Part 2: Complex and derived constructions. 1st edn. BySimon C. Dik. Ed. By Kees Hengeveld (review)

2000· article· en· W2037559002 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueLanguage · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhonologyLinguisticsGenerative grammarGrammarHistoryPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

210 LANGUAGE, VOLUME 76, NUMBER 1 (2000) 'Phonology above the word', introduces prosodie phonology. This book gives a very good presentation and overview ofthe actual mainstream phonological theories. It poses many problems phonology has had to deal with in the last 30 years and presents the solutions that have best addressed them. The discussions are clear, complete, and not too technical. As said above, this book gives the newcomer in phonology a very good introduction to mainstream generative phonology. It would have been interesting to find, in the preface or the epilogue, a short paragraph saying that, though the theories presented in the book are accepted and used by a majority of researchers in phonology, other theories, some outside generative linguistics, are developed and may be worth looking into. [Alain Thériault, Université de Montréal.] The proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual child language research forum. Ed. by Eve V. Clark. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1997. Pp. x, 308. This volume contains 25 papers delivered at Stanford University, 12-14. April 1996. The papers, which are presented alphabetically by contributors' names, may be grouped by area of investigation. Semantics: Thomas Lee discusses the acquisition of cumulative and distributive readings ofquantifiers in Chinese, and Xlangdong Jia, Patricia Brooks, and Martin Braine focus on children's use of universal quantifiers in this language. Hrafnhildur Ragnarsdóttir and Sven Stromqvist investigate the acquisition of grammatical devices expressing spatial relations in Scandinavian languages. Lourdes de León studies the development of the notion of vertical path in Tzotzil (Mayan). Gedeon DeAk and Michael Maratsos evaluate the methodology for assessing semantic representations through children 's referential acts. Annick DeHouwer looks at the development of past verb forms in a Dutch-English bilingual child; Hrafnhildur Ragnarsdóttir, Hanne Gram Simonsen, and Kim Plunkett compare the acquisition of these forms in Icelandic and Norwegian. Nitya Sethuraman, Adele Goldberg, and Judith Goodman investigate whether the meanings of new verbs can be derived solely from the verbs' syntactic environment. Masami Nomura and Yasuhiro Shirai study the overextension of intransitive to transitive verbs in Japanese children. Processing: Letitta Naigles argues that children at seventeen months do not show substantial verb comprehension. Allyson Carter and LouAnn Gerken claim that young children use function morphemes as an aid in parsing speech. Phonology: Thierry Nazzi explores how rhythm influences early speech perception, and Richard F. S. Hung claims that rhythm differences in Mandarin and Taiwanese Chinese result in different acquisition strategies. Penelope Brown examines the roles of prosody and semantic salience in the acquisition of first verbs in Tzeltal Mayan. Heather Goad argues that children's first word-final consonants are syllabified as onsets of empty-headed syllables. Mark Hale and Charles Reiss propose that deviations from target forms in children's phonological production are due to performance factors instead of children 's grammar. Pragmatics: Shu-Hui Eileen Chen investigates how Mandarin-speaking children and adults use word order and competing stress to interpret given and new information. Syntax: Helen Goodluck, Arhonto Terzi, and Gema Chocono Díaz study the influence of lexical semantics and subordinate clause morphology on the acquisition of controlled PRO. Narrative: F. Hülya Özcan examines pronominalization strategies in the narratives of Turkishspeaking children; Norma Jean Gomme and Carolyn Johnson investigate this area in English-speaking children. David Wilkins explores the construction of complex motion events in Arrernte children's narratives. General Issues: Judy Kegl and John McWhorter present the emergence of Nicaraguan Sign Language as an example of current-day creolization. Werner Deutsch, Angela Wagner, Renate Burchardt, Karen Jahn, and Nina Schulz discuss the acquisition of possessives in children with siblings versus singletons. Susanne Döpke argues that structures characteristic of bilingual acquisition are due to increased processing complexity oftwo languages. ?e? Nakamura investigates Japanese boys' and girls' acquisition of gender-specific linguistic features. This book makes available generally high-quality work on diverse aspects of children's language development , representing various theoretical approaches to acquisition. [Ellen Thompson, University ofPuerto Rico.] The theory of functional grammar. Part 1 : The structure of the clause. 2nd edn. By Simon C. Dik. (Functional grammar series 20.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997. Pp. xx, 509. Part 2: Complex and derived constructions. 1st...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,488
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle