Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I was greatly honored when Jim Campbell invited me to be Guest Editor for this edition of JPO. I have known Jim since he was a student in Glasgow, and it gives me great pleasure to see the prominent position he now occupies within his profession in the USA. The subject I have chosen to feature in this edition is the management of the lower limb problems of children with cerebral palsy. Back in 1995, as a member of the Executive Board of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO), I was asked to organize a Consensus Conference on this topic, which was held at Duke University, Durham, NC, with Mike Shuch acting as the local organizer. The report of this event, which is available from the ISPO office in Copenhagen, was published early in 1997 and has proved a very popular publication. Among the many recommendations contained in it were two specific proposals for further action by ISPO. First, it was recommended that ISPO should organize multidisciplinary Instructional Courses to disseminate information on the state of the art in this area of clinical practice. To date, four courses have been held, in Toronto, Ljubljana, Dallas, and San Salvador, with further courses scheduled for 2002 and 2003. For this edition of JPO, I have asked two internationally respected practitioners, a rehabilitation physician and an orthotist, to bring you up to date on this topic from their personal professional perspective. The second recommendation of the Consensus Conference directed at ISPO derived from the observation that the majority of the published research on this topic was “seriously scientifically and experimentally flawed…ranging from non-randomized current cohort comparisons to case reports.” It was suggested that one of the reasons for this situation was the absence of a generally accepted standard method of recording the status of and nature of the various treatments provided to this group of patients. It was therefore proposed that ISPO should undertake the development of such a “protocol.” I have been personally responsible for the project that was initiated by ISPO to address this objective, and in the third of the “invited” contributions to this edition, I have attempted to describe for you the result of this activity. The management of cerebral palsy is one of the areas of clinical practice in which a team approach is absolutely essential. I sincerely hope that this multidisciplinary “symposium” will assist you, the orthotic professional, to optimize your important role as a member of that team.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».