MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2038568550 · doi:10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000471

Special Issue on the 10th Anniversary of IIFC

2014· article· en· W2038568550 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott T. Smith, J.F. Chen

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Composites for Construction · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMaterials scienceComposite materialPolymer scienceForensic engineeringEngineering physicsEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC) was formed in 2003 with a mission to advance the understanding and application of fiber–reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in civil infrastructure. Since 2005, IIFC has enjoyed a fruitful association with ASCE via co-sponsorship of the Journal of Composites for Construction (JCC). Therefore, it is fitting that this present JCC issue commemorates the 10th anniversary of IIFC. This is the third special IIFC issue published by JCC; the first two issues were in April 2007 (“Recent International Advancements in FRP Research and Application in Construction”) and April 2011 (“In Honor of Professor Urs Meier”). The flagship events of IIFC are undoubtedly its biannual worldwide and Asia-Pacific regional conference series, which are known as FRP Composites in Civil Engineering (CICE) and Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures (APFIS), respectively. These conferences are held in alternating years at differing locations around the world: CICE in 2001 (Hong Kong), 2004 (Adelaide), 2006 (Miami), 2008 (Zurich), 2010 (Beijing), and 2012 (Rome); and APFIS in 2007 (Hong Kong), 2009 (Seoul), 2012 (Sapporo), and 2013 (Melbourne). CICE 2014 will be held in Vancouver and CICE 2016 in Hong Kong.This special issue of JCC has been timed for release prior to CICE 2014. IIFC also co-sponsors other international conference series and workshops. To better disseminate knowledge to the wider community, IIFC makes the proceedings of most IIFC official and supported events available on its website (http://www.iifc-hq.org) for free download. IIFC publishes a newsletter and all copies are also held on the IIFC website. The newsletter commenced in 1993, and for its first 10 years, was known as FRP International. IIFC also runs several working groups that offer tangible benefits such as educational resources, state-of-the-art reports, conference special sessions, and journal special issues. IIFC recognizes excellence in the form of several awards, namely, IIFC Medal, Distinguished Young Researcher Award, President’s Award, Lifetime Achievement Award, conference best paper awards, and IIFC fellowships. The IIFC website contains lists of all award recipients over the years, in addition to far more information than can be contained in this editorial. IIFC is a dynamic organization that has been positively influenced by numerous individuals over the years. It is governed by an Executive Committee, which is overseen by an Advisory Committee. The Council is populated by up to 40 elected leading figures in the field from around the world, plus members of the Advisory Committee. At present, 21 countries are represented on these three committees and several of these leading figures also serve on the Editorial Board of JCC. This special issue contains 18 invited papers contributed by members of these committees and their collaborators, addressing a diverse range of topics that are representative of the breadth of activity in the field. More specifically, the papers are of an experimental, analytical, and numerical nature and address: • FRP for strengthening concrete; namely, prestressed FRP plates, strips, and rods (two papers), confinement (one paper), FRP patch anchors (one paper), limits to the application of FRP for repair (one paper), near-surface mounted FRP (one paper), cementitious bonding agents (three papers), and large strain capacity FRP (one paper); • FRP for strengthening timber (one paper), steel (one paper), and masonry (one paper) construction materials; and • FRP for new construction; namely, hybrid FRP tendons (one paper), FRP bars (two papers), FRP beams (one paper), and stay-in-place structural forms (one paper). There is plenty of work still to be done in the field. In particular, more systematic and in-depth research is required on the long-term behavior of both FRP structures and FRP strengthened structures to substantiate the common claim that such structures have superior durability over other structures. Innovative combinations of FRP with either traditional construction materials or new materials to produce new structural members and forms will have an important role in designing the next generation of high-performance and sustainable structures. There is no doubt that the conversion of research findings into workable design guidelines and standards for use by design engineers is critical in widening the applications of FRP in civil construction. The contributions of numerous individuals are acknowledged in the preparation of this special issue. The authors of the papers in this issue are thanked for preparing high-quality manuscripts. Professor Charles E. Bakis, Editor-in-Chief of JCC, is thanked for handling the paper review process and ensuring maintenance of the high JCC standard. Professor Bakis is also supported by Ms. Renee Lindenberg and a large team of reviewers; their contributions are all acknowledged. The idea of an IIFC 10th anniversary special issue was positively received by Professor Lawrence C. Bank, IIFC President, and by the members of the Executive Committee following discussions after CICE 2012. For that, they are all thanked for their support. Finally, all members of IIFC, past and present, are thanked for their various contributions over the years, which have enabled IIFC to move into its second decade on a sound and positive footing.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,204
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,684

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0110,004
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2040,135

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Composites for ConstructionMême sujetStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteTravaux en français237 207