Contrary images: Photographing the new pacific in<i>walkabout</i>magazine
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Contrary images; photographing the new Pacific in Walkabout magazineThe pictorial magazine Walkabout offered readers a monthly lesson on the 'South Seas' for over forty years.From 1934 to 1974, Walkabout featured articles by travellers, officials, residents, journalists and visiting novelists.These liberally illustrated stories were accompanied by up to fifteen quarter, half and full-page black and white, sepia or colour photographs, which commonly focused on Papua New Guinea, 1 volcanoes, the Kontiki voyage, the South Pacific Commission, travel promotion conferences, distinctive regional food, fishing and fauna, and frequently depicted the dependent territories as possessions benefiting from benign colonial rule. 2 Nine out of ten issues of Walkabout contained articles and photographic essays on the Pacific, making potentially educative text and pictorial material both accessible and consistent in quantity for the forty years of the magazine's existence.At the same time, information about the South Seas from other sources increased: the growing number of daily newspapers and the heightened coverage the southwest Pacific received in international news coverage 3 presented Australians with a complex view of a world reshaped by new ideologies, consumerism and industry.Tourism to and from Australia also expanded in the post-second world war period, creating another level of interest. 4Walkabout was patriotic and informative about economic opportunities and infrastructure development in the southwest Pacific.The magazine celebrated early political advances as the colonies moved from nineteenth-century colonial rule to self-government and independence.After the 1939-45 wars, Walkabout reported on decolonisation, yet at the same time visually portrayed the 'South Seas' as though the pre-war colonial era had not ended: photographs on elections, wharves and new industries sat alongside a frontier Pacific depicted by partially clothed 'natives' and picturesque villages.Photographs of Papua New Guineans accustomed to new technologies, occupations and political responsibilities were often accompanied by text full of naive, primitivist and racist phrasing.This contradictory visual and textual format makes it difficult to define Walkabout's place in the history of Australian relations with the Pacific Islands. The history of WalkaboutIn the 1930s and 1940s, rural Australians were visually as familiar with Papua New Guinea as with the streets, galleries and parks of Sydney and Melbourne.Conversely, for urban Australians, familiarity with the 'South Seas' was possibly greater than for the Outback, Central Australia and the Northern Territory.[Can we have a sentence about why this may have been?Why did the Pacific receive such attention at this time, why was it more significant to Australia/ns than depictions of the Outback?]The Pacific Islands had been extensively illustrated since the 1890s in touring missionary lantern slide shows, postcards, serial encyclopaedia, magazines and illustrated weekend newspapers like the Australasian, The Queenslander, The Sydney Mail, Lone Hand, Sea Land and Air, and Town and Country Journal.By 1934, when Walkabout began, photographs of canoes, costumed dancers, suspension bridges, villages, partially clothed men and women, plantations and tropical port towns were not extraordinary. 5Mick Leahy's twenty highlands photographs and the twelve other un-attributed photographs on Tahiti and New Zealand in the first edition
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».