257 EFFECTS OF FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 8 ON CUMULUS EXPANSION AND NUCLEAR MATURATION IN BOVINE CUMULUS–OOCYTE COMPLEXES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recent data indicate that fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling regulates oocyte developmental competence. Fibroblast growth factor 10 enhanced nuclear maturation, cumulus expansion, and embryo development in cattle (Zhang et al. 2010 Reproduction 140, 815–826). Like FGF10, FGF8 is expressed in the bovine oocyte, but whereas FGF10 activates FGF receptors (FGFR) 1B and 2B with higher affinity, FGF8 preferentially activates FGF receptor (FGFR) 2C, FGFR3C, and FGFR4. The involvement of FGF8 in the regulation of bovine cumulus–oocyte complex (COC) maturation has remained unknown. This study aimed to assess the effects of FGF8 supplementation in the in vitro maturation medium on nuclear maturation, degree of cumulus expansion, and expression of the genes necessary for expansion in bovine COC. Groups of 20 immature COC (grades 1 and 2) aspirated from 3- to 8-mm follicles were cultured in 200-µL drops of TCM-199 supplemented with FSH (1 µg mL–1), LH (10 IU mL–1), pyruvate (22 µg mL–1), amikacin (75 µg mL–1), and graded doses of recombinant human FGF8 (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA; 0, 1, 10, and 100 ng mL–1) for 22 h at 38.5°C and 5% CO2. After culture, COC were visually classified according to the degree of cumulus expansion (grades 1 to 3, indicating absent, moderate, and full expansion, respectively). Oocytes were mechanically separated from cumulus cells and stained with Hoechst 33342 to assess meiosis progression. Total RNA was extracted from cumulus cells using RNeasy (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands), and 100 ng of RNA was reverse-transcribed using Omniscript (Qiagen). Expression levels of messenger RNA encoding genes necessary for cumulus expansion [prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2), pentraxin 3 (PTX3) and tumour necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6 protein (TSG6)] were assessed by real-time PCR, with cyclophilin (CYCA) as the housekeeping gene. Data were derived from 5 replicates. Maturation and expansion data were transformed to arcsine, and gene expression data were log transformed. Effects of treatments were tested by ANOVA, and means were compared with the Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference test. The FGF8 at 10 and 100 ng mL–1 reduced the proportion of oocytes reaching metaphase II (70, 64.8, 52.8, and 36% for FGF8 at 0, 1, 10, and 100 ng mL–1, respectively; P = 0.005) and increased the proportion of oocytes in metaphase I at 22 h of culture (30, 35.2, 47.2, and 64% for FGF8 at 0, 1, 10, and 100 ng mL–1, respectively; P = 0.004). Fibroblast growth factor 8 did not affect the degree of cumulus expansion as visually assessed. However, FGF8 at 10 and 100 ng mL–1 increased the messenger RNA abundance of PTGS2 [P = 0.0002; relative values (±SEM) of 0.69 ± 0.10, 0.63 ± 0.11, 1.56 ± 0.44, and 1.67 ± 0.20 for FGF8 at 0, 1, 10, and 100 ng mL–1, respectively] and HAS2 [P = 0.0002; relative values (±SEM) of 1.38 ± 0.15, 1.37 ± 0.24, 3.58 ± 0.61, and 4.14 ± 0.27 for FGF8 at 0, 1, 10, and 100 ng mL–1, respectively] in cumulus cells. In conclusion, the present data suggest the involvement of FGF8 in the mechanisms regulating transcription of expansion-inducing genes in cattle. In contrast with previous findings with FGF10, FGF8 inhibited nuclear maturation, suggesting different actions for different FGF in the regulation of COC maturation. Further research is needed to clarify the roles of FGF8 in the bovine COC. Supported by FAPESP.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».