Notice bibliographique
Résumé
STUDY DESIGN: A scholarly review of over 70 original papers from the late 19th and early 20th centuries. RESULTS: Although many neurotologists consider vestibular nerve section to be a recent innovation, eighth nerve division dates back to the dawn of intracranial surgery. Although surgery of peripheral nerves (e.g., repair after injury) is ancient, intracranial nerve surgery began in the latter part of the 19th century with fifth nerve division for tic douloureux. By analogy, it was reasoned that hyperactivity of the eighth nerve (initially tinnitus and later vertigo) could be relieved by dividing this nerve. In 1898, Fedor Krause (1856-1937) of Berlin attempted the first eighth nerve section. This patient, as did many during this era, died shortly after the operation. Most of the survivors had facial palsy. These innovative early surgeons used a variety of approaches, including the suboccipital, middle fossa, and transtemporal routes. After an initial burst of excitement during the first decade of the century, poor results led to few procedures being performed through the second and third decades. Throughout this era, there was much debate about the relative merits of labyrinthectomy (introduced by Milligan and Lake in 1904) as opposed to eighth nerve division. In the late 1920s, the prolific Walter E. Dandy (1886-1946) of Baltimore repopularized eighth nerve section and ultimately performed 607 procedures between 1927 and 1946. Although Dandy achieved a high vertigo control rate and reduced the mortality rate to <1%, he had a high rate of facial nerve weakness (9.1% transient, 4.2% permanent). Remarkably, the latter outcome was never published in his numerous papers on the subject, but was first revealed in a 1951 retrospective survey, which appeared some 5 years after his death. Selective division of the vestibular fibers was introduced by Kenneth G. McKenzie (1892-1963) of Toronto in 1931. At least 11 sizable series appeared in the literature before the introduction of microsurgical vestibular nerve section by William F. House (b. 1923) of Los Angeles in 1960. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction and progressive refinement of eighth nerve section played a central role in the evolution of operative neurotology. Many of the most vigorous debates of recent years (e.g., the choice of operative route, the optimal site of division, and the relative role of inner ear surgery vs. nerve surgery) have antecedents in the controversies of the distant past.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».