Deploying Multi-Stage Completion Technology in HPHT Applications
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Over the last several years open hole, multi-stage fracturing systems (OHMS) have proven to be an effective and efficient completion technology in many unconventional reservoirs. To date, OHMS completion technology has been limited to a maximum differential pressure of 68.9 MPa (10,000 psi) while performing the fracture stimulation treatment. As the industry targets deeper formations while drilling longer horizontal laterals, some wells now require treatment pressures higher than 68.9 MPa (10,000 psi) to perform the desired stimulation and realize the added production potential OHMS technology offers. As a result, there is a need for OHMS completion tools capable of handling very high pressure/high temperature (HPHT) conditions. The challenge in creating HPHT completion tools is in the material requirements. Considerations must be made regarding how to ensure integrity of the seal between the liner and the annulus, the gripping capability of the packer elements, and the ability of the materials to withstand the downhole conditions. HPHT OHMS tools were designed and manufactured with improved metal alloy and premium seal technology. The basic design and function of this HPHT system is the same as the standard OHMS; therefore, the HPHT tools build on the field-proven technology. Case study wells are presented in a recently developed, deep shale gas formation just east of the Rocky Mountains with highly overpressured downhole conditions. This, combined with a high fracture gradient, resulted in sub-optimal fracture initiation with the standard OHMS. By employing the HPHT OHMS, higher treating pressures were achieved with successful treatment results. Using this technology, several additional wells have been completed in the same geographical field and implemented in other HPHT applications. Introduction Over the last five years (2007 - 2011), more than 5,000 horizontal wellbores have been completed using OHMS in unconventional shales, tight sandstones and tight carbonate reservoirs in Western Canada. In addition to providing time and cost reductions, OHMS completions have realized production benefits compared to conventional completion methods because they allow contribution from natural fractures and the open hole lateral (Snyder and Seale, 2011; Edwards et al., 2010; Houston et al., 2010; Lohoefer et al., 2010; Lohoefer et al., 2010b; Samuelson et al., 2008). OHMS fracturing method. With the advancement of horizontal drilling and completion practices in recent years, many wells are now drilled horizontally with the intention to fracture stimulate multiple intervals. A very common technique has been to complete the well with a multi-stage fracturing system that is installed on a liner in the open hole without cementing the horizontal (Seale et al., 2006; Seale, 2007) (Fig. 1).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».