MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2040281183 · doi:10.2118/2007-178

A Laboratory Study of Polymer Flooding for Improving Heavy Oil Recovery

2007· article· en· W2040281183 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Regina
Organismes subventionnairesSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Mots-clésEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringPolymerFlooding (psychology)Water floodingEnvironmental scienceWaste managementComputer scienceProcess engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite material

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Polymer flooding for improving sweep efficiency has been studied extensively in laboratory and tested in fields for conventional oils. From the literature, polymer flooding is not recommended for oils with viscosity higher than 200 mPa.s. Severe viscous fingering during waterflooding of heavy oil leaves a large amount of oil untouched in the reservoir. Polymer flooding could be a potential method for enhanced heavy oil recovery by improving the sweep efficiency. However, how a polymer flooding should be planned for a heavy oil reservoir to make it economically feasible has not been studied. This paper investigated the potential of polymer flooding for heavy oil reservoir using a heavy oil of 1,450 mPa.s. Tertiary polymer flooding tests were performed in both homogeneous and heterogeneous (channelled) sandpacks. Results in homogeneous sandpacks showed that there existed a viscosity range for the injected polymer solution, in which the oil recovery had an evident increase with the increase of polymer solution viscosity. When the viscosity of polymer solution was outside of this range, the increase in polymer solution viscosity resulted in only a small incremental oil recovery. It was also found that the earlier the polymer flooding was applied, the lower the polymer solution viscosity was required to have an obvious increase in tertiary oil recovery. Results in channelled sandpack tests showed that the existence of heterogeneity in porous media greatly lowered the tertiary oil recovery by polymer flooding. These laboratory results will be helpful for the planning of polymer flooding for heavy oil reservoirs. Introduction Thermal method is the most effective technique for heavy oil recovery. However, many reservoirs' conditions restrict the application of thermal techniques, such as thin pay thickness or deep reservoir. Waterflooding of heavy oil reservoir can only achieve a very low oil recovery because of severe viscous fingering. Polymer flooding is a well-recognized technique of mobility control for conventional oils, which could be a potential method for enhanced heavy oil recovery by improving the sweep efficiency. Many laboratory studies and field testes of polymer flooding were reported for conventional oils. Jewett and Schurz1, Chang2 and Needham and Doe3 presented extensive literature reviews on polymer flooding. However, very few literatures4 were concerned with heavy oils. Generally, polymer flooding is applicable for the reservoir with high mobile oil saturation and moderate heterogeneity. It has not been recommended for the case with oil viscosity greater than 200 mPa.s2, 5, 6. Severe viscous fingering during waterflooding of heavy oil leaves large amount of oil in the reservoir untouched. Both technical and economic factors restrict the application of polymer flooding to heavy oil reservoirs with oil viscosity of thousands centipoises. It is not feasible to make the viscosity of the polymer solution to be comparable with that of the heavy oil in the reservoir. For instance, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide may not provide high viscosity in high-salinity water even a relatively high concentration is used, especially in the presence of divalent cations (such as calcium) 7.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,371
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle