Measuring Seismic Velocity Sensitivity To Production-Induced Strain at the Ekofisk Field
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In chalk reservoirs such as the Ekofisk Field, fluid flow and geomechanical effects combine to change both the location and properties of the reservoir and overburden. Pore pressure and fluid saturation changes cause reservoir compaction and perturb the elastic properties of the reservoir rocks. The overburden responds to the compaction with piston-like seafloor subsidence and length changes (strains). These overburden strains change the seismic velocity. The resulting velocity changes are observed on time-lapse seismic data as time-shifts that accumulate though the overburden. These processes are being monitored by GPS surveys of the production facilities, repeat logging of radioactive marker bullets, repeat bathymetry surveys, core sample analysis, and time lapse seismic data. The goal of this paper is to combine these measurements to better understand the relationship between overburden strains, changes in overburden velocity, and resulting time-lapse time-shifts. Introduction Compaction and subsidence were first observed at the Ekofisk field, more than twenty years ago, as a loss of several meters of water clearance on the production platform. Since then, the compaction and seafloor subsidence has been studied in detail. Sylte and others (1999) characterized the compaction and subsidence effects by repeated logging and bathymetric measurements. Guilbot and Smith (2002) mapped time-lapse time-shifts at the top reservoir level and time-compaction of the reservoir interval between 1989 and 1999 (Figure 1). Combined with a second monitor survey in 2003, these results have been successfully applied in well planning and waterflood management. However, the overburden displacements and velocity changes were not well understood and could not be linked directly to movements in fluid contacts or changes in reservoir pressure. Similar effects have been observed at the Valhall Field (Barkved and Kristiansen, 2005). Hatchell and Bourne (2005a) propose a seismic and geomechanical model linking overburden time-shifts to reservoir compaction. This model assumes that the fractional change in velocity is proportional to the vertical strain. The main uncertain parameter in this model is the velocity sensitivity to rock strain (Referred to here as R). Several studies have found R values between 4 and 6 fit timelapse time-shift observations (Tura et al, 2005; Hatchell and Bourne; 2005). In most cases, the velocity sensitivity to rock strain cannot be measured directly at the field scale because of a lack of large scale strain measurements. In this study, we use compaction logs and repeat bathymetric data to determine these large scale strains and use time-lapse time-shifts to measure velocity changes. The initial results of this work are consistent with R values of at least 4 to 6 (Figure 4). Figure 1: Ekofisk area map showing water injection wells, downhole strain measurements, the study area for this paper and time-lapse time-shifts at the top reservoir. (available in full paper) Field Observations A conceptual model of the Ekofisk reservoir compaction, subsidence and velocity changes are shown with a summary of well and seismic observations on Figure 2. Detailed bathymetry surveys in 1990 and 1999 resulted in field-wide maps of the water bottom. These surveys measured increases in water depth of 6 meters in the center of the field and 3 meters in the study area on the southwest flank (Figure 2).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».