MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2040897260 · doi:10.3138/cjh.49.1.67

Peter Brown on Christian Attitudes to Wealth in the Late Roman West

2014· article· en· W2040897260 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
T. D. Barnes, Peter Brown

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of History · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChristianitySubtitleClassicsTheme (computing)Index (typography)HistoryFront coverPeriod (music)TheologyArt historyArtPhilosophyCover (algebra)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Through Eye of a Needle: Wealth, Fall of Rome and Making of Christianity in West, 350-550 AD, by Peter Brown. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2012. 816 pp. $39.95 US (cloth). For half a century Peter Brown has been a prolific and highly influential historian of Late Antiquity. The structure of his latest and (by more than 100 pages) longest book, to which its main title merely alludes, resembles in several ways a set of variations on theme stated in its subtitle--Wealth, Fall of Rome, and Making of Christianity in West, 350-550 AD. The first of its five parts comprises four chapters delineating relevant social background of what follows (pp. 1-90). The next thirteen chapters concentrate on period before sack of Rome in 410: most of them assess attitudes to wealth of a series of individual authors including pagan Symmachus and Christians Ambrose, Augustine, and Paulinus of Nola (pp. 91-288). The third and fourth sections, which are briefer, have titles An Age of Crisis (pp. 289-384) and Aftermaths (pp. 385-453): together these two sections cover first three decades of fifth Gaul down to 450 and Italy before Byzantine invasion, while fifth section, entitled Toward Another World, considers sixth century (pp. 454-526). The twenty-nine chapters are supplemented by more than a hundred pages of endnotes (pp. 533-640), a bibliography of nearly eighty pages (pp. 641-717), and an index of forty-one pages (pp. 719-59). Brown also summarizes content of his long book in a very brief conclusion of four pages (pp. 527-30). Despite its length, book has a simple main thesis. Brown argues that Christian church in West saw an influx of wealth only after 370 and that this sudden influx brought with it lively controversies over proper use of wealth by Christians which lasted for two generations. After c. 430, however, of wealth created in fourth century evaporated or changed its structures in brutal crisis of fifth century, and the Christian churches found themselves in a generally impoverished world, in which the central institutions of Roman world lost much of their mystique, while there was consolidation on local level, and the collapse of traditional aristocracies left church in a unique position (pp. 529-30). These developments hastened the great turn towards other world that has been held to mark end of ancient world and beginning of middle ages (p. 530). Brown's bibliography is divided, in line with an unfortunate and misleading modern convention, into Primary Sources (pp. 641-54) and Secondary Sources (pp. 654-717). Brown uses latter term to designate modern studies, but modern works ought not to be called at all, since they do not constitute historical evidence for ancient world in any real sense. For Brown, however, these secondary sources do often function as source from which he has taken an interpretation that he then seeks to confirm by reference to ancient evidence. Hence, although Brown quotes and discusses an enormous range of ancient evidence, his interpretations are often neither derived from ancient evidence nor based primarily upon it. He seems rather to have formulated central themes of Eye of a Needle in light of his own earlier historical interpretations and his wide reading of modern writers such as Averil Cameron, Clifford Geertz, Ramsay MacMullen, Amaldo Momigliano, Paul Veyne, and many others. In itself of course this method of historical research and writing is perfectly legitimate, and Brown showers his readers with an enormous range of unborrowed erudition and a large number of stimulating ideas and apercus on specific issues, situations and writers. But his modern guides have sometimes led him astray into preferring their interpretations over ancient evidence. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of HistoryMême sujetHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeTravaux en français237 207