Peter Brown on Christian Attitudes to Wealth in the Late Roman West
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Through Eye of a Needle: Wealth, Fall of Rome and Making of Christianity in West, 350-550 AD, by Peter Brown. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2012. 816 pp. $39.95 US (cloth). For half a century Peter Brown has been a prolific and highly influential historian of Late Antiquity. The structure of his latest and (by more than 100 pages) longest book, to which its main title merely alludes, resembles in several ways a set of variations on theme stated in its subtitle--Wealth, Fall of Rome, and Making of Christianity in West, 350-550 AD. The first of its five parts comprises four chapters delineating relevant social background of what follows (pp. 1-90). The next thirteen chapters concentrate on period before sack of Rome in 410: most of them assess attitudes to wealth of a series of individual authors including pagan Symmachus and Christians Ambrose, Augustine, and Paulinus of Nola (pp. 91-288). The third and fourth sections, which are briefer, have titles An Age of Crisis (pp. 289-384) and Aftermaths (pp. 385-453): together these two sections cover first three decades of fifth Gaul down to 450 and Italy before Byzantine invasion, while fifth section, entitled Toward Another World, considers sixth century (pp. 454-526). The twenty-nine chapters are supplemented by more than a hundred pages of endnotes (pp. 533-640), a bibliography of nearly eighty pages (pp. 641-717), and an index of forty-one pages (pp. 719-59). Brown also summarizes content of his long book in a very brief conclusion of four pages (pp. 527-30). Despite its length, book has a simple main thesis. Brown argues that Christian church in West saw an influx of wealth only after 370 and that this sudden influx brought with it lively controversies over proper use of wealth by Christians which lasted for two generations. After c. 430, however, of wealth created in fourth century evaporated or changed its structures in brutal crisis of fifth century, and the Christian churches found themselves in a generally impoverished world, in which the central institutions of Roman world lost much of their mystique, while there was consolidation on local level, and the collapse of traditional aristocracies left church in a unique position (pp. 529-30). These developments hastened the great turn towards other world that has been held to mark end of ancient world and beginning of middle ages (p. 530). Brown's bibliography is divided, in line with an unfortunate and misleading modern convention, into Primary Sources (pp. 641-54) and Secondary Sources (pp. 654-717). Brown uses latter term to designate modern studies, but modern works ought not to be called at all, since they do not constitute historical evidence for ancient world in any real sense. For Brown, however, these secondary sources do often function as source from which he has taken an interpretation that he then seeks to confirm by reference to ancient evidence. Hence, although Brown quotes and discusses an enormous range of ancient evidence, his interpretations are often neither derived from ancient evidence nor based primarily upon it. He seems rather to have formulated central themes of Eye of a Needle in light of his own earlier historical interpretations and his wide reading of modern writers such as Averil Cameron, Clifford Geertz, Ramsay MacMullen, Amaldo Momigliano, Paul Veyne, and many others. In itself of course this method of historical research and writing is perfectly legitimate, and Brown showers his readers with an enormous range of unborrowed erudition and a large number of stimulating ideas and apercus on specific issues, situations and writers. But his modern guides have sometimes led him astray into preferring their interpretations over ancient evidence. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».