MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2040991326 · doi:10.1242/jeb.111302

The hormone battle behind ‘eau de snake’

2015· article· en· W2040991326 sur OpenAlexaff
Constance M. O’Connor

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSex pheromoneThamnophis sirtalisAttractivenessBiologyCourtshipZoologyPheromoneTestosterone (patch)MatingEcologyEndocrinologyPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

There are a few steps to successful reproduction. First, you need to pick a member of the correct species. Then you have to pick the correct sex to mate with, with bonus points for picking an attractive mate. In some species, males and females are visibly different from one another, with males typically being larger or more ornamented than females. In other species, males and females are similar in appearance, and need a different way to tell each other apart. The red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) is such a species, where males and females appear almost identical. These snakes solve the problem of telling males and females apart through pheromones, secreted hormones that serve as chemical signals. These ‘eau de snake’ pheromones are multi-purpose, and communicate the species, the sex and even the attractiveness of an individual.So what makes a snake smell like an attractive female? Rockwell Parker from Oregon State University, USA, and Robert Mason from Washington and Lee University, USA, decided to probe these pheromones more deeply and investigate how pheromone signals are regulated. In an initial study, the researchers learned that by injecting male snakes with estrogen, a hormone that is typically associated with females, they could induce the males to start producing female pheromones. Therefore, they knew that estrogens were important for stimulating the production of female pheromones. However, the researchers then wanted to know whether there was also a role for testosterone, a hormone that is typically associated with males. Is the absence of testosterone alone enough to activate the expression of the female pheromone?To investigate this question, the researchers compared the pheromone production of castrated males with males that underwent a sham surgery without having their testes removed. The scientists then compared these snakes to both castrated males and intact males that received supplementary testosterone. For all of the males, they measured total pheromone production, as well as assessing the composition of the pheromones. The researchers also measured how attractive the treated male snakes were to wild male snakes, by counting how many wild males would leave a female to investigate and court the treated males.The scientists first determined that castration reduced the total circulating testosterone compared with control males. Both castrated and intact snakes that were injected with testosterone had testosterone levels that were slightly higher than control males, but within the reasonable range of testosterone for this species. Castrated males produced more overall pheromone than intact males, and the pheromone profile was very similar to that of an attractive female. Interestingly, injecting the castrated males with testosterone cancelled this effect, and these males had a pheromone profile that was restored to that of a typical male. Finally, wild males were attracted to the castrated males, and frequently tried to court them. However, the wild males were much less interested in sham-operated males, or castrated males that were injected with supplementary testosterone.Since castrated male snakes have no specific hormone profile, and yet produce a female pheromone, the results of this study indicate that the default signalling in red-sided garter snakes is female, and male pheromone profiles are only produced when there is active inhibition of the female signalling by testosterone. Therefore, these results suggest that pheromone signalling in snakes is regulated not by one hormone, but by an active battle of hormones.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,009
Communication savante0,0040,005
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,286 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Experimental BiologyMême sujetInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorTravaux en français237 207