Annual and Social Variation in Foraging Effort of the Obligately Eusocial Sweat Bee, Halictus ligatus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Previous studies of the obligately eusocial sweat bee Halictus ligatus Say, at a nesting aggregation in Victoria, southern Ontario, Canada, showed how changes in local environmental conditions led to marked variation in demography, body size, and social patterns. Under the harsher weather conditions of 1990, mortality was higher, colony sizes were lower, brood body sizes were smaller, and surviving colonies were more strongly eusocial than under the milder conditions of 1991. These patterns suggested that the link between environmental conditions and colony social organization might be mediated by foraging effort, especially by queens during late spring and early summer when colonies were most susceptible to environmental constraints. Social parameters such as differences in reproductive effort between queens and workers or between haplometrotic and pleometrotic colonies, might also have a basis in differences in foraging effort. In this paper, I examine annual, seasonal, and social sources of variation in foraging effort of female H. ligatus from Victoria. Foraging effort of queens and workers was described in terms of seven different measures: number of foraging trips per day, flight time per trip, handling time per trip, average round trip time, total flight time per day, total handling time per day, and total provisioning time per day. These parameters were measured by observing individually marked queens and workers during their respective foraging periods in 1990 and 1991. Previously, it had been shown that in 1990 there were fewer days with weather suitable for flying, but observations of foraging effort show that the relatively large queens of 1990 spent about as much time foraging as the relatively small queens of 1991, and still produced much smaller brood. This suggests that a previously unsuspected effect of the poor weather in 1990 colonies was a scarcity of pollen, at least during the queen foraging period. Both queens and workers appear able to adjust their foraging effort to current conditions. As a result, the expected correlation between increased degree of eusociality (reproductive skew more strongly favouring queens) and stronger division of labour (workers doing a greater share of colony parental investment) did not occur, as workers apparently worked harder when their own reproductive opportunities increased. This may be a general pattern in social halictids.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».