Application of Energy-Absorbing Foam to the Seat Base to Mitigate Whiplash Injuries in Rear End Collisions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Rear end collisions account for approximately $9 billion annually in the United States alone. These types of collisions account for nearly 30% of all vehicle impacts making them the most common type. Soft tissue injury to the neck (i.e. “whiplash”) is typically associated with this type of collision due to the occupant dynamics of the passengers in the struck vehicle. At low relative impact velocities, whiplash-type injuries are known to occur but are typically attributed to: 1) improper seat adjustment, 2) an “out-of-position” event, or 3) a low injury threshold due to age, gender, etc. In high impact collisions, both whiplash and occupant ejection can take place, the latter placing far greater risk of injury not only to the front seat occupant, but also to any rear seat passengers as well. The automobile seating system is the predominant safety device employed to protect the occupant during these types of collisions. In current seats, designers have focused predominantly on modifying seat base strength, seat back stiffness/compliance and head restraint size and position as a means of mitigating injury. While all of these aspects are important and have increased the crashworthiness of the seat, the concept of utilizing the seat base as a component to absorb collision energy has remained relatively unexamined, and may offer the potential for reducing injuries in higher severity collisions.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper reports work related to the development of a supplemental safety system for the automobile seat where the goal is to further reduce the dynamic loading of the occupant to mitigate injury during a rear end collision. The initial step of this work was to develop and utilize several simulation models (using LS DYNA) to examine the relationship between collision conditions (such as vehicle-to-vehicle collision speeds, initial occupant and seat position, and occupant size) to accepted neck injury criteria for both low and high speed collisions. Utilizing these results, this paper examines the potential for deformable materials (in this study closed-cell foam) to absorb enough transmitted energy in order to reduce the dynamic loading experienced by the occupant. The relationships between energy levels transmitted to the occupant, the occupant dynamics, and how they affect the neck injury criteria assessed values are reported. Several foams, used industry wide, have been investigated in order to determine the best foam characteristics and geometrical shapes for low, high, and severe speed collisions. The results indicate that the foam's stress vs. volumetric strain curve, length, and cross-sectional area can affect the degree to which injury potential is reduced over a broad range of collision speeds. Further discussion of design considerations for such a supplemental system is also provided in this paper.</div></div>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».