MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2042261112 · doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2008.00528.x

Highlights from the Sixth Meeting of the European Society for<i>Chlamydia</i>Research

2009· editorial· en· W2042261112 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Svend Birkelund, Gunna Christiansen

Notice bibliographique

RevueFEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology · 2009
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueReproductive tract infections research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Historic evidence of infections caused by Chlamydia exists as long as 4000 years ago, and since the first description of the characteristic features of a chlamydial inclusion by Halbersteadter & von Provazek (1907), Chlamydia has been studied extensively. While the genome sequence of several Chlamydia species has provided extensive new knowledge concerning the coding capacity of Chlamydia, effective therapeutic or immunologic means of control or prevention against diseases caused by chlamydial infections are still not available. Hence, millions of samples are tested for the presence of Chlamydia world wide every year, and subjects found positive are treated with antibiotics. However, progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis and molecular biology of Chlamydia. This was abundantly illustrated at The Sixth Meeting of the European Society for Chlamydia Research held at The Lakeside Lecture Theatres, University of Aarhus, Denmark, July 1–4, 2008. Seventeen papers published in this Chlamydia thematic issue of FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology represent the highlights of this conference. Taxonomy in the family Chlamydiaceae has been hotly debated since Everett (1999) proposed the division of the genus Chlamydia into two distinct genera, a proposal later questioned by many in the Chlamydia field (Schachter et al., 2001). At the Aarhus meeting, Richard Stephens presented new evidence based on chlamydial evolutionary biology and sequenced genomes that strongly supports that the genus should not be divided. This is presented in the first article of the thematic issue. The thematic issue also includes a startling, completely new view by Brunham and Rekart of Chlamydia trachomatis disease expression. In 1991, the province of British Columbia, Canada (probably representative of the situation in the western world), initiated a comprehensive STD control program that included diagnostic testing and treatment of positive individuals. Detailed analysis of epidemiological data obtained since then indicates that the rate of C. trachomatis-positive cases per 100 000 individuals fell for the first 6 years; however, since 1998 an increasing number of positive samples is detected each year. Over the same period of time, a constant decrease in diagnosed sequelae (PID, ectopic pregnancy, and tubal infertility) has been observed. Brunham and Rekart explain this paradoxical phenomenon using the arrested immunity hypothesis by which reinfection becomes more likely as herd immunity is reduced. Because protective immunity only develops over time and treatment is normally initiated before this is allowed to happen, the consequence is that while female reproductive health is improved, the number of infected individuals keeps increasing. Only a protective vaccine can reverse this situation. An important aspect of the epidemiology of chlamydial infections is that isolates must be obtained and compared such that infections caused by distinct isolates can be traced. However, owing to the low genetic variability between isolates, a challenge has been in developing methods that allow isolates to be readily and reliably distinguished from one another. In a previous article (Pedersen et al., 2008) and also addressed in this thematic issue, Pedersen and colleagues showed that using both the sequence of the omp1 (ompA) gene and that of three new variable number tandem repeat loci of C. trachomatis, it was possible to discriminate between different isolates, and thus epidemiological associations could be established. A case in point is that of the continued emergence of a mutant of C. trachomatis in the Southern part of Sweden (Ripa & Nilsson, 2007). This mutant has a deletion in the common plasmid encompassing a primer site for two of the most commonly used nucleic acid amplification tests. The spread of this mutant has shown that C. trachomatis can survive, multiply and be sexually transmitted while avoiding detection by the tests used, illustrating that the specificity of such tests also may be a drawback. Interestingly, Pedersen (2008) used their genotyping method to determine that the C. trachomatis new variant does indeed represent a new clonal population. We hope to see you all at the seventh meeting of the European Society for Chlamydia Research to be held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands in 2012.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Science ouverte, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,296
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,010
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0060,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFEMS Immunology & Medical MicrobiologyMême sujetReproductive tract infections researchTravaux en français237 207