MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2042296525 · doi:10.1353/bhm.2005.0001

"Dearest G. .. yours WO": William Osler's Letters from Egypt to Grace Revere Osler (review)

2005· article· en· W2042296525 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeremiah A. Barondess

Notice bibliographique

RevueBulletin of the history of medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWifeBrotherContext (archaeology)ClassicsHistoryPrivilege (computing)MedicineTheologySociologyLawPhilosophyAnthropologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: "Dearest G . . . Yours WO": William Osler's Letters from Egypt to Grace Revere Osler Jeremiah A. Barondess William Osler . "Dearest G... Yours WO": William Osler's Letters from Egypt to Grace Revere Osler. Edited by Lawrence D. Longo and Philip M. Teigen; with a foreword by Charles G. Roland and a postscript by Caroline-Isabelle Caron. Osler Library Studies in the History of Medicine, no. 7. Montreal: Osler Library, McGill University; and Columbia, S.C.: American Osler Society, 20042. xii + 129 pp. Ill. $25.00 (0-7717-0601-4). What Philip M. Teigen has characterized as "the Osler Industry"1 is alive and well, as evidenced by a continuing flow of publications, pilgrimages, lectureships, and the activities of the various Osler societies. This continuing pursuit of a more detailed Osler emerges from interest in "Oslerian medicine," which is to say, medicine in its broad historical context; Osler as the Complete Physician; Osler's own writings, which form the underpinnings of his immense professional importance; and the personal Osler, which focuses on details of his practice, his relationships with his family, his quirks, practical jokes, dreams, finances, friendships, and professional relationships. The present volume speaks particularly to the personal Osler, through the medium of twenty-seven letters to his wife, Grace Revere Osler, written in 1911 during a six-week journey on the Nile with his older brother, Edmund Boyd, and five others. They provide a window onto the world of privilege nearly one hundred years ago. The Osler party, organized and led by Edmund Boyd, included also his daughter, Annabel Margaret ("Amo") and her husband; Elsie Bethune, a friend of Amo's; Ernest Caltanach, a prominent Toronto lawyer; Arnold Muirhead, future Rhodes Scholar and memoirist;2 and W. O. himself. Some sense of how privileged the trip arrangements were can be gleaned from the fact that the party of seven went up the Nile on a chartered boat with no passengers but themselves, and was served by a crew of thirty! Osler commented on the perfection of the arrangements when he said, "everything is provided—even to a laundry man" (p. 19). Osler had obviously prepared himself for the trip by reading in Egyptian history, and the letters are therefore those of an intelligent and informed traveler. Although he had left Grace behind—apparently at her insistence—or perhaps because he had left her behind, the letters contain recurrent assurances that she would not have liked the trip, chiefly because of the heat, the blowing sand, and other discomforts. The letters have a constrained Edwardian flavor; most are signed "yours," a few with "love." This may not be entirely ascribable to the post-Victorian/Edwardian mores of the time: in one of the letters, writing of his son, he refers to "that Oslerian shell of reserve" (p. 58). There are occasional references to visits from friends, to the vicissitudes of relatives, and particularly to what was obviously a very substantial level of concern about their son, Revere. While Osler seeks to reassure Grace about the boy in a number of the letters, his [End Page 144] own concerns are made plain: in one he writes, "such a nice letter from R[evere]—it seems that he must be making progress," and in another, "card from Revere—very hopeful. Dear lad—please do not worry, that boy will come out alright—good health, sweet disposition—hang the brains—they might only get him in trouble" (p. 56). A window on Osler's circle, and on the travel habits of his class, is offered by the number of people he met on the trip who were already known to him: colleagues, former patients, and old friends from Johns Hopkins University were added to new acquaintances, chiefly medical, who came his way as they went up the Nile. He visited several hospitals, and saw examples of diseases he had not previously seen. Through a good part of the trip he provided medical care for Mr. James Ross, a wealthy Canadian and former business partner of Mrs. Osler's brother. Ross was traveling on his own yacht, which, in light of his illness (thought by W. O. at one point to be...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,123

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0370,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBulletin of the history of medicineMême sujetHistory of Medical PracticeTravaux en français237 207