MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2042616307 · doi:10.4103/0019-5278.72236

The healthy workplace initiative

2010· article· en· W2042616307 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
SM Shanbhag

Notice bibliographique

RevueIndian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeelingConnotationAusterityService (business)Process (computing)Human resourcesWork (physics)Public relationsBusinessHuman servicesHealth carePsychologyMarketingPolitical scienceManagementEconomicsSocial psychologyEconomic growthLawPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In our society, doctors are seen to have reactive (curative) rather than a proactive (preventive) role. All of us believe that a doctor is required only when one is ill. Organizations, which are an integral part of the society, also believed that the medical departments are needed to take care of their injured or ill human resources and hence perform a service function and did not have a meaningful role in the business. We have seen many instances when the medical departments have been axed in austerity drives when the organizations have not been performing well financially. Historically, organizations have followed a financial model. The healthiness of a business meant sound financial health. Successful organizations were those that maximized monetary profits. This narrow view normally prevents positive health. This thought process was also responsible for creating a divide between the manager and the worker – “the thinker and the doer”. Workers were thought to be machines, which explains the connotation of the term “manpower”. Workers were thought to be dispensable and the issues relating to them were not considered important. It was thought that as they were being compensated for the work performed by them they did not deserve any further attention. Financial returns and rewards were not enough to motivate the workers to sustain high levels of performance. Human beings were different from other resources because they had their own views, thoughts and feelings. Organizations took a long time to realize that beside financial returns, physical well being, intellectual recognition and emotional satisfaction were also important factors in improving performance and productivity. Organizations started recognizing the above fact in the latter half of the 20th century. Along with various governmental and non-governmental stakeholders, they started initiatives for their employees as well as recognized the need for organizations to interact with the society. These initiatives like corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and learning organizations addressed some issues like good practices and ethics, which had an impact on workers and the society. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as physical, social and mental well being and not merely an absence of disease. The Healthy Workplace initiative, which began in the latter half of the nineties as a WHO initiative, addresses health issues in a holistic manner. The philosophy of this initiative provides for addressing health issues at the workplace, which include health surveillance, hazard free workplace, health care delivery at the workplaces, support for secondary and tertiary level health care, avenues for satisfying the emotional and spiritual needs of the human being and makes the individual feel that he is a very important part of the organization. The initiative also addresses the issues of relating to its wider environment by promoting health and wellness in the community and behaving as a responsible corporate citizen of the community’s health, happiness and prosperity. The implementation of the Healthy Workplace initiative will reduce sickness absenteeism, reduce liability, increase productivity, improve industrial relations and go a long way in image building. The result of all the above is profitability. Hence, making a commitment to this initiative and investing money for it is a recipe for success and value addition to business. The Healthy Workplace initiative is a partnership between the organization, the unions, the governmental organizations and the NGOs. This initiative has been implemented with a good degree of success in UK, Europe, Canada and Latin America. The global HECONet – Healthy Companies Network – is a non-profit organization working in line with WHO strategies outlined in the Ottawa and Jakarta declarations focused on the occupational setting in the Healthy Work Approach. It acts as a facilitator between the governments and businesses, and the Indian Association of Occupational Health is strategically placed to take an initiative to network with international agencies and bring together other NGOs, governmental agencies and promote this initiative to the managers of progressive industries. Industries implementing this initiative will, without doubt, reap its benefits, as Good Health means Good Business.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,069
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,229

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,004
Communication savante0,0090,005
Science ouverte0,0020,021
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0690,023

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIndian Journal of Occupational and Environmental MedicineMême sujetGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyTravaux en français237 207