MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2043060245 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2014.5b4

Drug to Enhance NMDA Receptors Studied to Treat Negative Symptoms

2014· article· en· W2043060245 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Arehart-Treichel

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueTryptophan and brain disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNMDA receptorGlutamate receptorSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PlaceboReceptorNeuroscienceMedicinePharmacologyDrugClinical trialPsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical and Research NewsFull AccessDrug to Enhance NMDA Receptors Studied to Treat Negative SymptomsJoan Arehart-TreichelJoan Arehart-TreichelSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:12 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2014.5b4AbstractThough one NMDA receptor enhancer has shown mixed results in treating negative symptoms, experts on the subject believe that these medications might help some patients with such symptoms.An experimental drug called bitopertin, which enhances NMDA receptor activity—that is, boosts glutamate action in the brain—was found in a phase 2 clinical trial to exert modest effects against the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, according to a study by Luca Santarelli, M.D., senior vice-president of neuroscience at Switzerland-based F. Hoffman-La Roche, and colleagues published online April 2 in JAMA Psychiatry.Deficient NMDA receptor activity has been thought to play a role in the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The NMDA receptor transmits the signaling of glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain. However, to do its job, the receptor also needs the amino acid glucine to bind to it.Thus Santarelli and his team wondered whether a drug that boosts glycine levels and in turn enhances NMDA receptor activity, such as the experimental drug bitopertin, might counter negative symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia. And they launched a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 66 sites in Brazil, France, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, and the United States to find out.The trial involved 323 subjects with schizophrenia and with predominantly negative symptoms. The subjects were randomized to receive, for eight weeks, not only standard antipsychotic therapy, but one of four treatments—bitopertin in daily dosages of either 10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg a day, or a placebo. The main outcome measure was a change from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative factor score. Functioning was evaluated with the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale.The reduction of the PANSS negative factor score was significantly greater in the subjects who received 10 mg or 30 mg a day of bitopertin than in subjects who received a placebo. In contrast, the reductions of the score in subjects who received 60 mg a day of bitopertin and in subjects who received a placebo were comparable. Moreover, the greatest effect of bitopertin on functioning as evaluated with the PSP scale was observed in the bitopertin group taking 10 mg a day. Changes from baseline PSP total score for the other two bitopertin dose groups did not differ from those in the placebo group.“Overall, 10 mg a day of bitopertin was most efficacious in reducing negative symptoms. . .while 30 mg a day produced a similar, but somewhat weaker, effect,” the researchers concluded. They had found comparable results in preclinical studies, they noted. Thus, low or moderate doses of bitopertin appeared to be optimal for best clinical efficacy.In an accompanying editorial, Donald Goff, M.D., a professor of psychiatry at New York University and an expert on translational schizophrenia research, said, “Although the therapeutic effect [of bitopertin] was only modest, this is very welcome news because the path to drug development in schizophrenia has been littered with disappointments.”The bad news, however, Goff pointed out, is that on January 21, Roche announced that two phase 3 trials of bitopertin for negative symptoms failed to achieve primary end points. “Once again, we are faced with the dilemma of an initial rigorous trial providing support for a compound that is well-grounded in preclinical and clinical studies, followed by a failure to replicate. . . .”While expressing his disappointment with the phase 3 results for bitopertin, Serdar Dursun, M.D., a professor of psychiatry and neuroscience at the University of Alberta in Canada, said that he remains optimistic that drugs that enhance the NMDA receptor might ultimately prove useful in treating negative symptoms. “There must be improved clinical trial methods that include identification of biomarkers so as to reduce the patient heterogeneity problem in schizophrenia studies,” he explained. “It is possible that modulating the NMDA receptor complex via the glycine site may require a personalized patient-tailored approach involving perhaps pharmacogenetic and/or other studies on biomarkers.”Indeed, “It’s possible that a subgroup of patients might benefit from these agents, but Roche wasn’t able to identify a biomarker that would predict response,” Goff commented to Psychiatric News.The study was funded by F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd. ■An abstract of “Effect of Bitopertin, a Glycine Reuptake Inhibitor, on Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia” can be accessed here. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,344
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetTryptophan and brain disordersTravaux en français237 207