D-region HF absorption models incorporating real-time riometer measurements
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Absorption of HF (3-30 MHz) radio waves is largely determined by the electron density in the ionospheric D region (50-90 km altitude). During solar proton events (SPE), when the flux of >10 MeV solar protons exceeds 10 cm-2s-1sr-1, the D region ionization may be significantly enhanced at high latitudes where geomagnetic shielding is weaker. This results in polar cap absorption (PCA) events which can cause HF communications outages lasting several days. Models of PCA events are being improved to provide accurate real-time and short-term forecast models of HF absorption for use by HF radio users such as aircraft operating on trans-polar routes. The models are based on the D-region Absorption Prediction model (D-RAP) from the US Space Weather Prediction Service [1, 2] which predicts absorption from real-time measurements of solar X-ray and integral proton flux at one of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES). Protons with energy below a cut-off energy Ecat a given invariant latitude - a function of geomagnetic indices Kpand Dst[3] - lack the rigidity (momentum per unit charge) required to overcome geomagnetic shielding, whilst protons with energy less than thresholds Etnand Etdfor night and daytime ionospheres respectively, fail to penetrate down to the D-region. Coefficients of the D-RAP model were based on physical modelling and absorption measurements from a single riometer in Thule, Greenland [3] which measures cosmic noise absorption at 30 MHz. The accuracy of the model was validated for 11 SPEs at Thule by Sauer and Wilkinson [2] and for five further riometers in Canada and Finland by Akmaev et al. [4] who suggested possible errors in the location of the rigidity cut-off at high geomagnetic latitudes. In this paper we extend validation of D-RAP to measurements from 13 riometers in the Canadian NORSTAR array and a riometer in Kilpisjärvi, Finland for 93 solar proton events (SPE) spanning the whole of solar cycle 23 (1996-2008). To improve model performance, coefficients are optimized using a non-linear least-squares fit to minimize the root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of the absorption estimate. Using optimized coefficients the RMSE reduces from 0.78 dB to 0.72 dB (using all 14 riometers) or from 0.82 dB to 0.53 dB taking only the single highest latitude riometer, Taloyoak (64.5°N, 93.6°W). By introducing linear terms characterizing the Magnetic Local Time (MLT) dependence, the RMSE may be further reduced to 0.66 dB (all riometers). The inclusion of further linear terms proportional to the hardness of the proton energy spectrum and on solar-zenith angle yielded no significant improvement to the RMSE. The benefits of two modifications to D-RAP suggested by Neal et al. [5] based on Polar Operational Environmental Satellite (POES) measurements - a 1-2° correction in the rigidity cut-off invariant latitude and a 3-hour time lag in the Kpindex used in its determination - will also be presented. A short-term forecast capability may be implemented by measuring proton flux at the Advanced Composition Explorer satellite (ACE) located at the L1 libration point which provides 25-70 minute forewarning of proton flux changes (depending on solar wind velocity). An optimized model using ACE integral proton flux measurements (time-shifted to Earth's location) instead of D-RAP reduces the RMSE from 0.57 dB to 0.47 dB (Taloyoak riometer) and from 0.69 dB to 0.64 dB (all riometers). The nowcast accuracy of the PCA model may be improved by finding model parameters coefficients using a weighted least-squares fit, with higher weights assigned in the most recent 30-minute period of riometer measurements. An example of this technique is presented for the 6-day SPE following the particularly intense solar flare of 14 July 2000, known as the “Bastille-day event”.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».