MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2043196342 · doi:10.1097/01.jsm.0000407929.35973.b9

Corticosteroid and Other Injections in the Management of Tendinopathies

2011· letter· en· W2043196342 sur OpenAlexaff
Lawrence Hart

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Journal of Sport Medicine · 2011
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTendon Structure and Treatment
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineClubResearch councilRehabilitationJournal clubMedical educationLibrary scienceFamily medicinePhysical therapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and risk of adverse effects of peritendinous corticosteroid and other injections in the management of tendinopathy. DATA SOURCES: In March 2010, using terms describing common tendinopathies and injections, including steroids, local anesthetics, sclerosing solutions, aprotinin, platelet-rich plasma, botulinum toxins, and glycosaminoglycans, 8 databases were searched without language, publication, or date restrictions. Reference lists were scanned for additional articles. STUDY SELECTION: Criteria for inclusion were randomized controlled trials that compared ≥1 peritendinous injection with placebo or other nonsurgical intervention. Study methods were independently assessed by 2 reviewers (reliability, κ = 0.85) on a modified PEDro scale, and scores were required to be ≥50% for inclusion. Studies with a high proportion of patients with adhesive capsulitis, full-thickness rotator cuff tears, or rheumatologic disease were excluded. Of 2954 studies screened, 174 full-text articles were evaluated for inclusion by 1 investigator and confirmed by a second. Of 64 studies that were initially included, the 41 that scored >50% on the PEDro scale were retained. DATA EXTRACTION: Information about injection type and comparison treatments, site of the tendinopathy, duration of follow-up (short term, <12 weeks; long term, ≥52 weeks), outcomes (pain, function, and patient-rated overall improvement), and frequency of adverse events was extracted. Study results were pooled when the data were sufficiently homogeneous. MAIN RESULTS: Clinically diagnosed lateral epicondylalgia: In 3 trials that compared corticosteroid injections with no intervention, corticosteroid injections were effective in the short term in pain reduction [standard mean difference (SMD), 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-1.71], in improving function (SMD, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.22-1.77), and in overall improvement [relative risk (RR), 3.47; 95% CI, 2.11-5.69]. In the intermediate and long term, corticosteroid injections were less effective than no intervention. In comparison with placebo injection (4 studies), there was limited evidence for the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection in relieving pain. In comparison with physiotherapy (4 studies), corticosteroid injection was more effective in the short term for improving function (SMD, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.55) and in overall improvement (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.75-3.21), and there was strong evidence among heterogeneous studies for reducing pain. Intermediate and long-term results were worse in pain and function for the corticosteroid injection intervention. Corticosteroid injections were more effective than orthotic devices for the wrist or elbow for overall improvement in the short term but not in the long term (2 studies). Effectiveness did not differ in comparisons of high- versus low-corticosteroid dosage, and between triamcinolone and hydrocortisone. Pain and function improved more with corticosteroid than with platelet-rich plasma injection in the short term but were worse in the long term. Rotator cuff tendinopathy: In the short term, corticosteroid injection improved pain (SMD, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.35-1.01) and function (SMD, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.29-0.95) more than placebo (3 studies). In comparisons with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and with NSAIDs plus placebo injection, no differences in pain or function were found (3 studies) or when NSAIDs were administered in addition to corticosteroid and placebo injections (4 studies). Corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy did not differ in effectiveness (2 studies), although 1 study found short-term greater overall improvement and function after corticosteroid injection. Adverse effects were reported in 82% of corticosteroid injection trials. In comparison with placebo injections, corticosteroid injections were associated with an increased risk of atrophy for Achilles and patellar tendons but not elbow tendons. In trials of injections of sclerosant, platelet-rich plasma, proteinase, glycosaminoglycan polysulfate, sodium hyaluronate, prolotherapy, and botulinum toxin compared with placebo injection or other therapies, only sodium hyaluronate compared with placebo showed consistently better results in the short and long term in overall improvement and pain reduction of lateral epicondylalgia (1 study). Adverse effects were reported for all these injections except sclerosant and platelet-rich plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid injection is beneficial in the short term for the treatment of tendinopathies but may be worse than other treatments in the intermediate and long terms. No clear evidence of benefit of other injections was shown, except for sodium hyaluronate in the short and long term.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,048

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,003
Bibliométrie0,0050,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,082
Tête enseignante GPT0,373
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations93
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Journal of Sport MedicineMême sujetTendon Structure and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207