SYMPATRIC GROWTH MORPHS AND SIZE BIMODALITY IN THE GREEN SEA URCHIN (<i>STRONGYLOCENTROTUS DROEBACHIENSIS</i>)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) have been a dominant structuring force in boreal, hard-bottom communities and recently have become an important fishery. Despite these roles, relatively little is known about the age, growth, and demographics of field populations. To begin to address these issues, we systematically sampled urchins during 1997 and 1998 at two sites (Allen Island [AI] and Schoodic Peninsula [SP]) in the Gulf of Maine, USA. Basic demographic information (density and size structure) was obtained and a subset of urchins aged by counting annual bands on the interambulacral plates. Size-at-age analyses showed that the population at AI consisted of two sympatric growth morphs, fast growing (fg) and slow growing (sg), each described by its own von Bertalanffy growth parameters for mean size and size variance. The two morphs also differed in maximum observed ages (sg, 6–11 yr, vs. fg, 16–18 yr) and in maximum test diameter sizes (sg, 30–35 mm, vs. fg, 50–70 mm). At SP, a single (fg) morph was identified which had growth characteristics similar to the fg morph at AI. An obviously bimodal size-frequency distribution at AI reflects the accumulation of urchins of each morph at asymptotic size. We advanced several hypotheses; including intrinsic factors, e.g., sex ratios, morphology, and genetics; and extrinsic factors, e.g., density, spatial distribution, settlement history, growth history, and migration; to explain the origin and coexistence of the two growth forms. Using primary and post hoc data analyses, we rejected sex ratio, density, spatial relations, and morphology. Analysis of annual growth and age structure indicated that the two morphs had different settlement histories, suggesting the mixing of two genetically distinct populations. Our post hoc analyses could not reject the genetics or growth history and migration hypotheses. Genetically different larvae, or else a phased process of differential settlement, migration, and growth (threshold migration hypothesis) are the most likely cause(s) for the two morphs. Our data indicate that field growth rates in green urchins are intrinsically highly variable, but also vary interannually probably in relation to their environment. Intrinsic variability provides a novel explanation for bimodality of size-frequency distributions in urchin populations. Interestingly, the sublegal size (<50 mm) and short life span of the sg morph preempts its recruitment into the fishery. Moreover, if the sg morph is widespread and genetically based, intensive harvesting may enhance selection for the sg morph. These findings may have serious implications for understanding the population structure and managing the green urchin fishery, and for assessing the grazing impact of these urchins in nearshore communities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».