Abstract SY26-02: SWOG S0701 phase III randomized trial of three antibiotic regimens to eradicate helicobacter pylori: efficacy and failure at one year
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second cause of cancer death worldwide. In several Latin American countries, it is the most common cancer and the most common cause of cancer death in men and women combined. Infection with H. pylori (Hp) is associated with the development of gastric carcinoma in many parts of the world including Latin America and is thought to be one of the causative agents. We conducted a clinical trial designed to test the effectiveness of three antibiotic regimens for Hp eradication in seven sites in Latin America while assessing feasibility, and the possibility of identifying a direction for future chemoprevention trials of gastric cancer. Methods: Under a locally IRB approved clinical protocol and signed informed consent requirement, 1852 adults (ages 21-65 years) from the general populations of Chile (Santiago), Colombia (Túquerres), Costa Rica (Guanacaste), Honduras (Copán), México (Obregon and Tapachula), and Nicaragua (León) were screened for the presence of Hp infection with the urea breath test (UBT). 79.4% were positive. 1463 participants consented to be randomized to one of three regimens administered twice a day: 14 days of lansoprazole 30mg, amoxicillin 1,000mg, and clarithromycin 500mg (triple 14d); 5 days of lansoprazole 30mg and amoxicillin 1,000mg followed by 5 days of lansoprazole 30mg, clarithromycin 500mg, and metronidazole 500mg (sequential 10d) or 5 days of lansoprazole 30mg, amoxicillin 1,000mg, and clarithromycin 500mg, and metronidazole 500mg (concomitant 5d). Response was assessed at 6-8 weeks after treatment by UBT. Recurrence at one year was also assessed by UBT. Results are presented by UBT testing and by all participants enrolled (intention-to-treat (ITT)) analysis. 123 (30.8%) patients who did not return for UBT testing were presumed failures at one year. Studies of HP virulence, pepsinogens I and II, as well as inflammatory cytokines, are in progress. Results: Participant characteristics were similar in the three treatment groups. At 6-8 weeks after treatment, UBT was negative in 1133/1414 (80.1%) patients who underwent follow-up UBT and in 1133/1463 (77.4%) of all participants enrolled. The triple 14d regimen was the superior (p 0.008) regimen among all who had repeat UBT and in the ITT group (p 0.005). The estimated fraction remaining free of infection at one year was 79.3% among participants followed by UBT, and 72.7% for all participants enrolled in the study (Table 1). At one year, in those patients with a negative UBT at 6-8 weeks, Hp recurrence was observed in 11.5%. The risk of infection was greater by site - worse in Chile and Colombia- (p <0.0001), age - worse in the younger - (p 0.03), education - worse in the poorly educated - (p 0.02) and household overcrowding - worse in more crowded households - (p 0.007). Gender, prior antibiotic use, water source and sanitation were not significant factors. By multivariate analysis, the most important predictors of Hp recurrence at one year were study site (p <0.0001), younger age (p <0.001) and crowded households (p 0.003). Conclusions: This is the largest, prospective, randomized clinical trial ever conducted to treat Hp. The trial was successful in recruiting participants, as well as conducting and monitoring trial treatments and outcomes in 6 Latin American countries. We demonstrated greater treatment efficacy of the triple 14d antibiotic regimen at 6-8 weeks, but a one year 11.5% recrudescence rate regardless of antibiotic regimen. Study site, younger age and crowded households are important factors associated with Hp recurrence at one year. The recurrence rate at one year is concerning, and points to the necessity of conducting additional studies of the molecular biology and pathogenesis of Hp before launching definitive chemoprevention trials of gastric cancer. Given the unique prevalence of gastric cancer and other infection-related cancers in Latin America, we propose that Latin America investigators consider the formation of an independent Cancer Cooperative Group to facilitate research involving cancer. Just as the United States wisely invested in the development of cancer cooperative groups in Europe (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC) and in Canada (National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group - NCIC-CTG), we believe that the time has come for consideration of the creation of a cancer cooperative group in Latin America with financial support from the National Cancer Institute. Support: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant #43930 and National Cancer Institute grant # CA037429. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr SY26-02. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-SY26-02
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».