MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2043424952 · doi:10.1353/jer.2014.0036

Jackson’s Sword: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1810–1821 by Samuel J. Watson, and: Peacekeepers and Conquerors: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1821–1846 by Samuel J. Watson (review)

2014· article· en· W2043424952 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wayne Wei‐siang Hsieh

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Early Republic · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFrontierWatsonOfficerSWORDScholarshipPeacekeepingManagementLawHistorySociologyPolitical scienceEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Jackson’s Sword: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1810–1821 by Samuel J. Watson, and: Peacekeepers and Conquerors: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1821–1846 by Samuel J. Watson Wayne Wei-siang Hsieh (bio) Keywords Andrew Jackson, U.S. Army officers, Military history, Frontier, Indian removal Jackson’s Sword: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1810–1821. By Samuel J. Watson. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2012. Pp. 460. Cloth, $39.95.) Peacekeepers and Conquerors: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1821–1846. By Samuel J. Watson. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2013. Pp. 636. Cloth, $49.95.) Historians of the antebellum United States Army have long been aware of Samuel J. Watson’s voluminous Rice University dissertation, the origins of both Jackson’s Sword and Peacekeepers and Conquerors, for its prodigious archival base and thoroughness. It is thus gratifying to see Watson’s scholarship now receive a wider audience with the publication of that work in a magisterial two-volume history of the U.S. Army’s officer corps between 1810 and 1846, which now replaces William Skelton’s well-regarded study as the standard work on the United States Army in that time period.1 Although the volumes are published separately, readers should see them as a single unified work, and only then can readers fully comprehend Watson’s historiographical contributions. Furthermore, both volumes refer to each other to such a degree that their division feels unnatural at times—although the combined length by itself provides [End Page 275] ample justification for the separation into two volumes. Regardless, this combined work surpasses the already impressive archival base of Watson’s dissertation, and engages a current and diverse range of historiographical themes involving empire, borderlands, American state formation, and the agency of non-state factors. It also solidifies and expands previous work in older and existing literatures on professionalization, American diplomatic and military history, and the history of the American West. This first volume focuses on the Army officer corps pre-professional years, when Andrew Jackson commanded the Division of the South and defied his civilian superiors in the service of sectional interests—namely expansion of the southern slave frontier into Florida, even at the cost of risking war with both Spain and Great Britain. Watson highlights Jackson’s dominating personality, aggressiveness, and ruthless desire to assert American domination over both Indian tribes and rival European powers. While Jackson and other like-minded officers proved indifferent to constitutional provisions of civilian control, his ferocious advocacy of expansion had a powerful political constituency. As Watson puts it, “Jackson was the ultimate political general: the erstwhile Tennessee politician saw the white settlers of the Southwest as his true constituency, regardless of national elections, the national legislature, or the national constitution” (Jackson’s Sword, 186). Indeed, Jackson’s appeal went beyond the frontier regions, as seen in his later political success. Even as he clashed with national authorities such as Secretary of War John C. Calhoun, those same leaders were able to use Jackson’s violent methods as a lever of coercion to establish American sovereignty in contested frontier regions such as Florida. Yet the acquisition of Florida, domestic sectional controversies over slavery extension, and a less adversarial relationship with Great Britain stabilized the American frontier. The American republic then sought a professionalized officer corps to manage relations along its national borders, as opposed to aggressive, impetuous, and even insubordinate commanders such as Jackson. The end of Jackson’s Sword lays the groundwork of volume two of Watson’s study, which chronicles the activities and significance of an officer corps with “greater professional commitment, experience (as much political and diplomatic as military) developed during extended careers, and accountability to civilian authority, tempered in the forge of frustrating, politically complex constabulary operations along the nation’s frontiers” (Jackson’s Sword, vii). [End Page 276] The second volume closely examines Indian removal, the Second Seminole War, peacekeeping operations on the Canadian and southwestern American frontiers, and the Army officer corps’ preparations for and initial reactions to the Mexican War. In contrast to the impetuous and irresponsible aggressiveness of Jackson and his subordinates...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,267
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,008
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Early RepublicMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207