Jackson’s Sword: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1810–1821 by Samuel J. Watson, and: Peacekeepers and Conquerors: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1821–1846 by Samuel J. Watson (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Jackson’s Sword: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1810–1821 by Samuel J. Watson, and: Peacekeepers and Conquerors: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1821–1846 by Samuel J. Watson Wayne Wei-siang Hsieh (bio) Keywords Andrew Jackson, U.S. Army officers, Military history, Frontier, Indian removal Jackson’s Sword: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1810–1821. By Samuel J. Watson. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2012. Pp. 460. Cloth, $39.95.) Peacekeepers and Conquerors: The Army Officer Corps on the American Frontier, 1821–1846. By Samuel J. Watson. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2013. Pp. 636. Cloth, $49.95.) Historians of the antebellum United States Army have long been aware of Samuel J. Watson’s voluminous Rice University dissertation, the origins of both Jackson’s Sword and Peacekeepers and Conquerors, for its prodigious archival base and thoroughness. It is thus gratifying to see Watson’s scholarship now receive a wider audience with the publication of that work in a magisterial two-volume history of the U.S. Army’s officer corps between 1810 and 1846, which now replaces William Skelton’s well-regarded study as the standard work on the United States Army in that time period.1 Although the volumes are published separately, readers should see them as a single unified work, and only then can readers fully comprehend Watson’s historiographical contributions. Furthermore, both volumes refer to each other to such a degree that their division feels unnatural at times—although the combined length by itself provides [End Page 275] ample justification for the separation into two volumes. Regardless, this combined work surpasses the already impressive archival base of Watson’s dissertation, and engages a current and diverse range of historiographical themes involving empire, borderlands, American state formation, and the agency of non-state factors. It also solidifies and expands previous work in older and existing literatures on professionalization, American diplomatic and military history, and the history of the American West. This first volume focuses on the Army officer corps pre-professional years, when Andrew Jackson commanded the Division of the South and defied his civilian superiors in the service of sectional interests—namely expansion of the southern slave frontier into Florida, even at the cost of risking war with both Spain and Great Britain. Watson highlights Jackson’s dominating personality, aggressiveness, and ruthless desire to assert American domination over both Indian tribes and rival European powers. While Jackson and other like-minded officers proved indifferent to constitutional provisions of civilian control, his ferocious advocacy of expansion had a powerful political constituency. As Watson puts it, “Jackson was the ultimate political general: the erstwhile Tennessee politician saw the white settlers of the Southwest as his true constituency, regardless of national elections, the national legislature, or the national constitution” (Jackson’s Sword, 186). Indeed, Jackson’s appeal went beyond the frontier regions, as seen in his later political success. Even as he clashed with national authorities such as Secretary of War John C. Calhoun, those same leaders were able to use Jackson’s violent methods as a lever of coercion to establish American sovereignty in contested frontier regions such as Florida. Yet the acquisition of Florida, domestic sectional controversies over slavery extension, and a less adversarial relationship with Great Britain stabilized the American frontier. The American republic then sought a professionalized officer corps to manage relations along its national borders, as opposed to aggressive, impetuous, and even insubordinate commanders such as Jackson. The end of Jackson’s Sword lays the groundwork of volume two of Watson’s study, which chronicles the activities and significance of an officer corps with “greater professional commitment, experience (as much political and diplomatic as military) developed during extended careers, and accountability to civilian authority, tempered in the forge of frustrating, politically complex constabulary operations along the nation’s frontiers” (Jackson’s Sword, vii). [End Page 276] The second volume closely examines Indian removal, the Second Seminole War, peacekeeping operations on the Canadian and southwestern American frontiers, and the Army officer corps’ preparations for and initial reactions to the Mexican War. In contrast to the impetuous and irresponsible aggressiveness of Jackson and his subordinates...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».