MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2043809580 · doi:10.1002/hep.20010

Federally funded research in hepatology

2004· article· en· W2043809580 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Jenny Heathcote

Notice bibliographique

RevueHepatology · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHepatologyViral hepatitisLiver diseaseHepatocellular carcinomaPopulationImmunologyCholestasisInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Canada is an enormous landmass with a population no larger than that of California (approximately 30 million). Nearly 50% of citizens in the major cities were born outside of Canada; this raises a wide variety of medical and cultural issues, recently highlighted by the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic. The 'silver lining' to this recent crisis was the recognition by the federal government of Canada that formation of a Center for Disease Control North, which would include viral hepatitis—now the most common cause of liver disease worldwide—is appropriate. Medical research in Canada is supported by several federal programs, the largest of which is the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) program. There are 13 Institutes; viral hepatitis is a priority for the Institute of Infection and Immunity. Most noninfectious and nonimmunologic liver research falls under the auspices of the Nutrition and Metabolism Institute. Currently funded studies include those on the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, therapeutic vaccine development for chronic hepatitis B and C, the potential infectious etiology of primary biliary cirrhosis, brain-liver interaction/crosstalk in liver disease (cholestasis-induced fatigue and hepatitis C cognitive dysfunction), pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma, mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis, cellular and molecular mechanisms of organ injury, potassium ion channels in hepatocytes, autoimmune molecular mechanisms in a mouse model for autoimmune hepatitis, and molecular mechanisms of iron metabolism. In addition, a request for applications for research on obesity recently has funded studies on lipoproteins, oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation and its effect on macrophages, as well as another study on fatty acid binding proteins. Following the success of a Health Canada human immunodeficiency virus initiative, a hepatitis C program was introduced in 1999. In collaboration with CIHR, this program provided $18.375 million in research funds over the subsequent 5 years. To date, 128 researchers have received funding and 21 individuals have received salary support. The program has been successful at both luring well seasoned investigators from different fields into the field of viral hepatitis and supporting younger investigators from many different disciplines, all with an interest in hepatitis C. At the time of this writing, a request for renewal of this initiative at a greatly enhanced funding level, with a newly created hepatitis C clinical trials network, is pending approval. A Canadian viral hepatitis network linking three centers has received funding and currently is working on mathematical models for public health policy development and estimation of the cost of therapy. In 2001, CIHR issued a request for applications for research training programs to build research capacity within Canada. Two of the 83 funded programs (each receiving $300,000 per year for 6 years) focus on the liver. One of these, a 'regenerative medicine' program, is led by Gary Levy at the University of Toronto and comprises a multidisciplinary team of mentors in the areas of stem cell therapy, therapeutic cloning, tissue engineering, and gene therapy. The other program focuses on hepatitis C and has recruited mentors with expertise in basic virology, biochemistry (including proteomics), and immunology, as well as the more clinical sciences (nursing, medicine, surgery, biostatistics and health economics, and public health). Students funded by these research training programs choose a specific mentor and are expected to enroll in a postgraduate degree program and participate in an ongoing transdisciplinary education program transmitted across many Canadian universities via webcasting and video conferencing. Other governmental initiatives designed to address issues of recruitment and retention of excellent researchers include the establishment of Canada Research Chairs, which provide both salary support and some operating costs. One such chair has been awarded to Thomas Michalak, of Memorial University in Newfoundland, who studies the natural history and pathogenesis of hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma in the woodchuck and who maintains one of the few such animal colonies in the world. Another federal government initiative, 'Networks of Centers of Excellence', supports the Viral Hepatitis Research Program at the University of Alberta, where Lorne Tyrrell and colleagues have developed a murine model for hepatitis C. Tyrrell and colleagues will use this support predominantly to facilitate their studies on drug development for hepatitis C, performed in collaboration with virologists across Canada. Finally, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation provides lump sums, mainly for equipment (no running costs!), and has provided funds for the Immune Tolerance in Transplantation Program at the University of Toronto. There are 16 Canadian universities that have medical schools, and space permits only a sketch of federally funded research on basic and/or clinical sciences within the field of hepatology, research that is ongoing at almost all 16 of these universities. As is the case worldwide, the electronic age has greatly facilitated collaborative research across this vast country and now is enabling students from all universities to benefit from expertise at specific centers. The future is exciting, with the potential for new initiatives that will further enhance research and its translation, so as to ensure that all Canadians remain well informed and have universal access to the very latest developments in health care.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Bibliométrie
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: Incitatifs · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,997
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,853

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2550,139

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,156
Tête enseignante GPT0,431
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
DomaineIncitatifs
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHepatologyMême sujetLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207