MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2044281572 · doi:10.1080/00085006.2000.11092234

Coming out of the Margins: Belarusan Cinema in the 1990s

2000· article· en· W2044281572 sur OpenAlex
Iurii Stulov

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEastern European Communism and Reforms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndependence (probability theory)VictoryHistoryHomelandPersecutionMovie theaterEmpireAncient historyParliamentDemocracyMedia studiesEconomic historyLawPoliticsPolitical scienceSociologyArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In August 1991 thousands of Minskers stood outside parliament, waiting impatiently for the results of the vote on Belarusan independence; their victory was only hours away. The days were hot and the sun shone brightly, and their world looked brave and new. People proudly identified themselves as Belarusans in the hope of a new Renaissance. Snatches of conversation spoken in Belarusan could be heard everywhere, and for the first time in history Belarusan was proclaimed the official language of the Republic of Belarus. Many who did not know their own language, which had survived despite centuries of persecution, became aware of the need to learn it. For once the nation was not simply a collection of folk dances and songs, but was seen as a young state in its own right; democratic forces perceived Belarus as a bridge between West and East, a buffer between civilizations. This new role could give the country a rate chance to acquire a voice of its own in the international arena. The divided world needed mediatiors, and Belarus was an ideal candidate. Throughout its history Belarus has known only brief periods of independence, torn between Eastern and Western neighbors who have considered it a key geostrategic point in the European world. Its hi tory of subjugation and the struggle for and cultural survival has been truly dramatic; conquerors have cared little for the wants and needs of Belarusans. Regarded as the remote outpost of empires (Kievan Rus', the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the kingdom of Poland, the Russian empire, the USSR), its language and have been quashed repeatedly. This persistent denial of Belarusan identity has produced a peculiar result: many in Belarus consider themselves people of culture rather than people of territory. Thus, the declaration of sovereignty by the Belarusan parliament was a momentous event for the of Belarus: it showed that, despite its history of occupation, the country had maintained its independence and its desire for self-government. Though the consciousness of Belarus' multi-ethnic population is still weak, the country has demonstrated to the world that it has its own goals and agenda, its own unique identity. Independence was an important matter for Belarusan artists as well. For the first time in history they could identify themselves as Belarusans, and not as part of a larger whole to which they could not always relate. Soviet ideology had hypocritically imposed a theory of art that was in form and socialist in content. The national component had little to do with consciousness; it was based on Marxist-Leninist principles, and focused on ethnography and the re-interpretation of history from the Soviet imperial perspective, which led to serious distortions and misinterpretations. Nationalism became one of the greatest sins in Soviet society, which, according to Lenin, sought the of nations: Marxism is irreconcilable with nationalism, be it the most just, pure, refined and civilized. Instead of any nationalism, Marxism advances internationalism, [the] amalgamation of all nations in a higher unity.1 These ideologies had resulted in the degradation of art in the Soviet republics as a result of their loss of identity. With independence came the time for selfexpression in a nation which had been denied that right for hundreds of years. Belarusan film-makers actively involved in the formation of the new state' felt the need to express nationhood in their works, no matter how vague that idea seemed, and resorted either to the genetic memory of Belarusans or to the dreams of the nation. Belarusan cinematography began with Belgoskino, the first Belarusan film studio, which was founded in 1928 in-ironically-Leningrad. Belgoskino moved to Minsk in 1939 where it acquired the name of Belarusfilm. By 1991, Belarusfilm studios had become the fifth largest Soviet film enterprise (after the three Moscow studios and Lenfilm studios in Leningrad), making about 10 feature films, over 20 TV films and serials and an array of documentaries, plus cartoons and popular science films per year. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,916
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,829

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,246
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle