Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This time last year we announced that Macromolecular Bioscience (along with Macromolecular Theory & Simulations and Macromolecular Reaction Engineering) would be published online only starting with the first issue of 2013. Almost one year later, we can sum up that this change has been a positive experience through and through. From board members and authors we have received solely positive feedback. Our authors especially appreciate the free color figures in their published articles. In 2013, submissions to the journal increased by almost 20% compared to the previous year. The community was obviously ready for the change. But how about us editors? Certainly it was unfamiliar in the beginning to go to a conference without some printed copies of the journal in your hands. Luckily, our colleagues from the marketing department had some clever ideas on how to present our content in the digital world. QR codes are incorporated into promotional flyers to highlight outstanding publications. Times are changing: while I as an active researcher liked to read through journal copies at conferences a couple of years ago, nowadays people can be seen scanning the QR codes in those flyers and enjoying the free access to selected contributions. On top of that, we draw additional attention to carefully selected articles that we promote on MaterialsViews and MaterialsViewsChina (see Figure 1). There is no doubt that Macromolecular Bioscience is getting more attention than ever before. This is confirmed when looking at the number of full text downloads, which have gone up significantly. In the first 9 months of 2013, we observed a nearly 20% growth (compared to the same period in 2012). The papers with the highest numbers of downloads between November 2012 and October 2013 are given in Table 1. Many of these contributions deal with polymeric scaffolds and tissue engineering, but also topics such as biosensors, bioadhesion, drug delivery, and vaccines are covered. Regionally, a wide diversity can be seen. Many of these top papers come from the USA and Canada, but also contributions from China, Germany, and the Netherlands made it to the top list. I would like to thank the authors of these outstanding papers as well as our other authors from around the world for their trust, our critical reviewers and board members for their feedback, and you, our readers, for your ongoing interest in our journal. Together we are looking forward to an exciting 2014! Kirsten Severing Editor
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».