Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Anne’s World: A New Century of Anne of Green Gables Lesley D. Clement Irene Gammel and Benjamin LeFebvre, eds. Anne’s World: A New Century of Anne of Green Gables. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010. 263 pp. $29.95. “Anne’s World,” a link on the web site www.foreveranne.com, invites the prospective tourist “to discover the beauty and magic of the real Prince Edward Island.” The eleven essays in Irene Gammel and Benjamin Lefebvre’s Anne’s World: A New Century of Anne of Green Gables explore the ideas of extension and “faux reality” to interrogate the assumption that [End Page 216] any world has exclusive ownership over Anne Shirley or that any of Anne’s worlds can aver to be “real.” It has long been recognized that Anne’s world reaches well beyond the Cavendish farmhouse where L. M. Montgomery penned the first of her series of nine books featuring the precocious redhead around whom an industry of books, film and stage adaptations, tourist sites and memorabilia, websites, and discussion and research groups has developed. To date, much attention has been given to tracing the paths that led to the creation of Anne and her world. In Looking for Anne: How Lucy Maud Montgomery Dreamed Up a Literary Classic (2008), for example, Gammel demonstrates that even before Montgomery submitted her manuscript to Boston’s L. C. Page in April 1907, the boundaries of Anne’s world stretched outside her Cavendish roots to encompass the images and stories from books and magazines that Montgomery had absorbed. Anne’s World, which the 2008 one hundredth anniversary of the publication of Anne of Green Gables inspired, extends old and blazes new paths, backwards and forward from 1908, inward and outward from Cavendish. Unlike other media forms celebrating this anniversary—exhibitions, articles and books, prequels and sequels—this anthology is the most self-consciously reflective of our twenty-first-century world that, in her introduction, “Reconsidering Anne’s World,” Gammel describes as “flowing, disjunctive, and migratory” (7) and in which Anne, “an über-connector” (3), “a polymorphous figure” (10), is still at home. The dual purposes of Anne’s World, as articulated in Gammel’s introduction, are amply realized. The first purpose is that of other publications inspired by the 2008 anniversary, such as Holly Blackford’s 100 Years of Anne with an “e” (2009): to consolidate previous scholarship and suggest how it might be extended. Anne’s World achieves this goal primarily through its valuable bibliography and through the first essay in which Carole Gerson traces “seven milestones”: the novel’s publication and early “branding” by Page; the Hollywood film versions of 1919 and 1934; the commemoration that began in 1936 with the federal government’s purchase of the property most associated with the “faux reality of Green Gables” (23); the global interest in Anne best represented by the Japanese translations commencing in 1952; adaptations, such as the musical in 1965 and television miniseries in 1985; the publication of the first of Montgomery’s journals in 1985, which helped launch the now well-respected academic field of Montgomery studies in the 1990s. If there is one noteworthy gap in this overview and the collection as a whole, it is the absence of any reflection on how the path that Elizabeth Epperly has blazed in exploring [End Page 217] Montgomery’s visual imagination might be extended through further research of the photographs and scrapbooks. While the sixteen colour plates are of both familiar and unfamiliar images, there is none of Montgomery’s photographs, which await further examination in the University of Guelph’s recently digitized archives. It is the successful fulfilment of the second goal that makes this anthology most distinctive and timely: the projection of “new points of departure” (8) for future study. While Gerson fast forwards through one hundred years of Anne-inspired interventions, Alison Matthews David and Kimberly Wahl look back to the emergence of the turn-of-the-century New Woman and the codes that her dress signaled to provide one explanation of how Anne and her appeal reflect a desire to straddle the familiar pastoral world of home and the modern world...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».