MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2045312855 · doi:10.4141/s04-076

Mycorrhiza and soil quality

2004· article· en· W2045312855 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Chantal Hamel, Denis A. Angers

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologySymbiosisArbuscular mycorrhizalAgricultureMycorrhizal fungiCroppingEcologyMycorrhizaArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The field of mycorrhizal research has traditionally been occupied by plant scientists. Until the 1980s, efforts were devoted to identifying the plant species forming arbuscular mycorrhizae, developing the taxonomy of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, and demonstrating the so-called mycorrhizal effect. In May 1987, the 7th North American Mycorrhizal Conference (NACOM ) was held in Gainesville, Florida, under the theme “Mycorrhizae in the next decade: Practical applications”. This meeting was intended to set the stage for exciting developments in the applications of mycorrhizae, particularly in agriculture. The potential contribution of AM symbiosis management was clearly evidenced. The level of understanding of the symbiosis, however, was still low. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are difficult to study because they are concealed in the soil and their biotrophic character greatly limits our ability to study them. Hypha and spore extraction was tedious and yielded only limited information. It became clear that before we could effectively utilize AM fungi in agricultural production, a better understanding of their ecology and their specific interactions with cropping systems had to be obtained. Progress in the management of AM fungi in agriculture since the 7th NACOM has been modest and, today, the main challenge is still to understand the ecology of AM symbioses. The introduction of molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to the study of AM fungi initiated a revolution. Tremendous progress in the genetics, physiology and taxonomy of AM fungi has been made, and research in these fields is very active. However, the research possibilities opened by PCR and other new technologies in molecular biology have drained mycorrhizologists from of the field of practical applications in plant production. While plant scientists were turning into “molecule-oriented biologists”, a few soil scientists and ecologists persisted in researching at the field scale how the AM symbiosis interacts with its environment. They found, in particular, that AM fungi were important not only for plant function but also for the maintenance of soil quality. Mycorrhizal research had become an aspect of soil science. The fourth International Conference on Mycorrhizae (ICOM 4) was held in Montreal, Quebec, in August 2003, jointly with the Canadian Society of Soil Science (CSSS) and the Canadian Society of Agronomy (CSA) under the theme “Mycorrhizae: Fundamental and multipurpose”. Two joint symposia were organized in an attempt to initiate collaboration between soil scientists, agronomists and mycorrhizologists. The papers from the CSA-ICOM joint symposium will be published in the Canadian Journal of Plant Science (Vol. 85 issue no. 1). Four keynote papers were presented at the joint symposium with CSSS and are published in this issue of the Canadian Journal of Soil Science. In addition, two poster and oral sessions were held, for a total of 53 papers concerned with the interactions between mycorrhizae and soil quality. This symposium clearly showed that AM fungi have a significant role in maintaining soil quality. Their effects on soil structure, water retention capacity and nutrient cycling are of critical importance to the maintenance of soil function in both natural and cultivated ecosystems. A major consequence of the growth of AM fungi in soils is their contribution to the maintenance of soil structure. Like many other soil organisms, AM fungi act as ecosystem engineers at the micro-scale and above. Recent research has shown that an AM-fungi-produced soil glycoprotein, glomalin, is positively correlated with aggregate water stability. The persistence of glomalin in soils may be related to the lasting effects of AM fungi on aggregate stability or to the possible hydrophobic nature of this protein. However, the chemical nature and actual mode of action of glomalin are still unclear, and more research is needed to better understand the mechanisms of the well-recognized role of AM fungi on soil structure. Since mycorrhizal colonization typically affects soil structure, it seems likely that AM fungi also affect soil water relations and, consequently, the water relations of the host plants. Experimental evidence supports this hypothesis, and also strengthens the assertion that AM fungal colonization of soil may be as important as the colonization of roots with regard to how AM symbiosis affects the water relations of host plants. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi also have an important role in other fundamental soil functions, such as cycling of C, N and P. The enhanced ability for absorption provided by AM fungi improves the host plants’ ability for nutrient uptake. Mycorrhizal plants appear to be effective competitors, which, under conditions of N and P limitations, could reduce the size of mineralizing populations in soil or change the quality of the decomposing litter. We hope that these texts will be stimulating and instrumental to the formation of symbiotic interdisciplinary research relationships.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2004
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Soil Science→Même sujetMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→Travaux en français237 207→