Abstract 5603: Common genetic variations in VDR, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 genes and breast cancer risk in African American and European American women in the Women's Circle of Health Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in vitamin D receptor (VDR) have been examined with breast cancer risk in populations of European ancestry. Because of the striking differences in vitamin D levels and in SNP linkage disequilibrium (LD) between African Americans (AA) and European Americans (EA), it is hypothesized that associations of VDR SNPs with breast cancer risk may differ by race. A total of 67 multi-population tagSNPs in the VDR, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 genes were genotyped in 928 breast cancer cases (547 AA and 381 EA) and 843 controls (461 AA and 382 EA) recruited through the Women's Circle of Health Study (WCHS), a case-control study based in New York City and seven counties in New Jersey. Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used for single SNP analysis, and LD block-based haplotype analysis was performed, with multiple comparisons corrected by permutation. In addition, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels were measured in the banked serum samples from 242 AA and 187 EA healthy women. Four VDR SNPs were associated with breast cancer risk in AA women, and rs2239186 remained significant (p=0.03) after multiple comparison correction. Women with the AG/GG genotype of rs2239186 had a lower risk of breast cancer (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.35-0.79) than those with the AA genotype, consistent with a three-SNP haplotype carrying the G allele of rs2239186 (OR=0.55, 95% CI=0.38-0.81) in AA women. In EA women, 2 SNPs in the VDR gene and 3 SNPs in the CYP24A1 gene were associated with breast cancer risk. EA women with the TT genotype of the VDR SNP rs11608702 had a significantly increased risk (OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.14-3.09), which were confirmed in an analysis of a two-SNP haplotype carrying the T allele (OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.12-1.85). In addition, a four-SNP haplotype in the CYP24A1 gene was associated with reduced cancer risk in EA women (OR=0.67, 95% CI=0.51-0.88). When stratified by menopausal status, the association of rs7975232 in VDR in EA women was stronger in postmenopausal women (OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.19-4.21); and the association of another VDR SNP rs886441 in AA women was stronger in premenopausal women (OR=2.27, 95% CI=1.32-3.90). Lastly, we found significant differences in 25OHD levels between AA and EA women; the least square mean and standard error were 14.9±0.5 vs 21.4±0.6 ng/mL (p<0.0001), respectively, after adjusting for age, BMI and season of blood collection. Dietary intake of vitamin D helped explain only 3% of the circulating levels. In conclusion, we found different SNPs associated with breast cancer risk between AA and EA women. Our findings support the hypothesis that the role of vitamin D-related genetic variations may be race-specific, possibly due to differences in linkage disequilibrium structure and in endogenous vitamin D levels between the two groups. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5603. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5603
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».