Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Pirates: A History Arne Bialuschewski Travers, Tim — Pirates: A History. Stroud, UK: The History Press, 2009 (hardcover edition, Tempus Publishing, 2007). Pp. 336. Numerous books on piracy have been published in recent years. Historians working in this field are hardly able to keep up with the surge of publications. This book provides a broad survey from the ancient Mediterranean to modern Somali pirates, from the seventeenth-century Caribbean to the Malacca Straits. Unlike most other recent publications on the subject, this book is written by a professional historian, so it is worth considering his perspective in some detail. To begin with the most important point: readers who expect new insights or interpretations of one of the most romanticized chapters in history will be disappointed. Tim Travers provides a narrative designed for a wide readership. Most topics are addressed in very general terms, based largely on the reading of secondary literature rather than original research. The use of primary sources is restricted to a few manuscripts exclusively from London depositories. The structure of this book is rather unconventional. Instead of an introduction, the reader finds a chapter on "The Pirate World," which deals with some features of the social and cultural history of piracy. Only in the conclusion does the author try to answer the question: what is a pirate? Piracy is generally defined as the arbitrary and indiscriminate seizure of goods, persons, and vessels at sea. Vikings, many Elizabethan sea rovers, and most buccaneers were not pirates, even though their exploits are described in Travers's book. The organization certainly has its merits, as it enables Travers to insert a broad spectrum of related topics, yet the title of the book is misleading. Travers's expertise in pirate history derives from having taught courses on the subject matter at the University of Calgary for more than a decade. This enables him to avoid the various traps into which too many authors fall. For example, Travers is correct to raise serious doubts as to whether Edward Thatch, better known as Blackbeard, really was the violent and ruthless roving villain portrayed in the literature. As well, the passage concerning the only two known female pirates of the early eighteenth century, Anne Bonny and Mary Read, is also more realistic than in most other recent publications. To be sure, this book still contains a number of errors; for instance, Dirk Chivers's real [End Page 272] name was Richard Sievers (p. 164), and Bartholomew Roberts did not kill the governor of Martinique, as asserted on page 195. Nevertheless, in comparison with other popular books on this subject matter, the author has done a good job sorting fact from fiction. In sum, this book provides a useful introduction to a topic that has drawn considerable public and scholarly attention in recent years. Travers's work places maritime depredations into the larger context of international rivalries and conflicts. One hopes that this book will find an eager and interested readership. Arne Bialuschewski Trent University Copyright © 2010 Histoire sociale / Social History
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».