Foam Cement Applications for Zonal Isolation in Coalbed Methane Wells
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract This paper discusses the application of foam cement technology for zonal isolation in coal bed methane (CBM) wells. CBM reservoirs have unique cleat structures that are weaker and less stable than conventional reservoirs. As the gas storage mechanisms in the CBM reservoirs release methane and other light gases through diffusion, bedding structures can be even more destabilized. Conventional cement sheaths may not withstand annular deformation and may crack because of cyclic stress loads. Results of recent laboratory tests and field applications have shown that foam cement can be effectively used to eliminate zonal isolation problems associated with the application of conventional cement jobs in CBM wells. Laboratory tests have shown that a foam-cemented annulus can elastically absorb stresses from the pressure-induced expansion of internal casing and deform without failure. The foamed cement can maintain bond and overall integrity in such tests at up to 10,000 psi internal casing pressure. In cycling tests, foam cement was found to withstand 100 cycles, up to 90% of shear failure index, without noticeable damage. Results of some recent laboratory tests are presented in this paper. Zonal isolation using foamed cement has been successfully conducted in many wells drilled in western Canada CBM reservoirs. An example of recent foamed cement application in a CBM well is also presented. Introduction Foam cement is a mixture of cement slurry, foaming agent, foam stabilizer, and nitrogen gas. When the foam cement is properly generated, a stable and lightweight slurry that looks like gray shaving cream can form (Fig. 1). When foam slurries are properly mixed and sheared, they often contain microscopic, discrete bubbles that will not coalesce or migrate. The bubbles formed are not interconnected (Fig. 2), which results in a low-density cement matrix with low permeability and relatively high strength. Historically, the primary purpose of foamed cement was to decrease the density of slurry. However, many other advantages have been identified, and subsequent applications of foam cement are well documented.1–7 This paper describes the most recent technology in foam cement application. Characteristics of the foam cement and laboratory test results are summarized. Guidelines for field applications are provided, and an example of a field application of foam cement in a CBM well is also presented. Physical Properties Of Foam Cement The following section briefly discusses some of the favorable physical properties of foam cement. Lightweight Stable foam cement can yield 720 kg/m3 downhole density at bottomhole conditions. During primary cementing, foam cement can prevent formation breakdown, lost circulation, and post-job cement fallback. The extremely lightweight quality of foam is especially useful for lost-circulation plugs where conventional methods of cementing may not be applicable. Excellent Strength-to-Density Ratio Foam cement has an excellent strength-to-density ratio (Fig. 3). Slurries that contain less water are usually stronger than those that carry a lot of water. With inert nitrogen gas as a filler material, slurries of even very low density can still have high solids content, which causes the ultimate strength to be relatively high.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».