MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2046911504 · doi:10.1353/esc.0.0093

Sound or Text: How Do You Heal a “Foreign Anguish”?

2007· article· en· W2046911504 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Katherine Verhagen

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSubversionSilencePoetryLiteratureHistoryDiasporaPower (physics)Identity (music)ArtSociologyAestheticsGender studiesLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

M. NOURBESE PHILIP PUBLISHED Discourse on Logic of Language in collection titled She Tries Her Tongue, Her Silence Softly Breaks (1989) address a diasporic collective identity, demanding a recognition and of a shared history in a Canadian landscape (CD track 10). In that she assumes the ordeal of testimony for people, calling audience hold we centre of rememberance / that forgets never that seers / word from source (96). By acting as voice of this community, she seeks break culture of silence and reclaim power of word. In order do so, she not only addresses topic of but also subverts standard English lyric voice with frequent interruptions in Trinidadian English speech. (1) However, as she 'became conscious of wanting subvert lyric voice [...] I had so succeeded at 'subversion; I found it difficult 'read' many of poems in collection, she reveals in A Genealogy of Resistance and Other Essays (126). Therein lies paradox of linguistic subversion: although she has disrupted authority of standard English, its language and history, she has disrupted ability read poems aloud. As a result, she determines that my work does not fit traditions of Black (A Genealogy 130-31) that rely upon performance and transmission. Thus, unreadable poems alienated from community of Caribbean and Afrosporic whom she was trying represent. At time of She Tries Her Tongue's publication, there were a number of dub poetry anthologies produced in Canada and in diaspora at large. (2) However, when placed side by side with a dub poet in a public reading, she feels that she has compete, but in vain, for that identification. Once asked perform after dub poet Linton Kwesi Johnson, she felt bound fail: [M]y poetry [...] was difficult 'read'--even I found that so ... I found myself avoiding these poems that could be described as 'difficult' and 'abstract' or 'innovative' In order address desired audience, members of diaspora, she selected poems, usually older ones, which were closer, on surface at least, being 'spiritual helpmate of Black nation' poems more in line with the traditions of Black (A Genealogy 129). (3) At time of writing, Afro-diasporic authenticity included having ability represent and replicate an oral voice. Nonetheless, graphical manipulation of text, particularly in standard English, is a dominant concern for Philip because she identifies language as place where fissure between a collective and a personal identity occurs. As critic Hortense Spillers claims that African-American writing is subject violent formation of a modern consciousness, [propagated by] initiative strikes which open Atlantic Slave Trade (63), so too does Philip assert that the progenitors of society as it exists today created a situation such that equation between i-mage and word was destroyed for in context of slavery (She Tries 14). [I]n stripping of language, by forced relocation and immersion in foreign language of English, slave's voice lost power to make and, simultaneously, express (12) and could only articulate a European ethnocentric world view that affirmed negative ]-mages about her (16). The role of New World Artist, according Philip, is give voice this split ]-mage of voiced silence (16), using new and different words, forged by the African []]n vortex of New World slavery (17)--words that comprise the demotic (18). As well, Philip alters orthography of word image speak essential being of people ... for whom artist creates. (4) Thus, Philip believes that she must, as Spillers puts it, strip down through layers of attenuated meanings . …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,759
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetCaribbean history, culture, and politicsTravaux en français237 207