Empirical Ground-motion Relations for ShakeMap Applications in Southeastern Canada and the Northeastern United States
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Other| March 01, 2005 Empirical Ground-motion Relations for ShakeMap Applications in Southeastern Canada and the Northeastern United States Sanlinn I. Kaka; Sanlinn I. Kaka Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, ON KlS 5B6 Canada skaka@ccs.carleton.ca gma@ccs.carleton.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gail M. Atkinson Gail M. Atkinson Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, ON KlS 5B6 Canada skaka@ccs.carleton.ca gma@ccs.carleton.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Sanlinn I. Kaka Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, ON KlS 5B6 Canada skaka@ccs.carleton.ca gma@ccs.carleton.ca Gail M. Atkinson Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, ON KlS 5B6 Canada skaka@ccs.carleton.ca gma@ccs.carleton.ca Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online Issn: 1938-2057 Print Issn: 0895-0695 © 2005 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2005) 76 (2): 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.2.274 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Sanlinn I. Kaka, Gail M. Atkinson; Empirical Ground-motion Relations for ShakeMap Applications in Southeastern Canada and the Northeastern United States. Seismological Research Letters 2005;; 76 (2): 274–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.2.274 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Abstract We have developed empirical relations that describe ground-motion amplitudes from earthquakes of 2 < M < 6 at regional distances of 10-500 km in southeastern Canada and the northeastern United States, for ShakeMap applications. The predictive ground-motion parameters are peak ground velocity, peak ground acceleration, and response spectra at frequencies of 1, 2, 5, and 10 Hz. The relations differ from previous relations developed by Atkinson and Boore (1995) in their focus on applicability to the small to moderate regional events important to reliable ShakeMap development. Because of this focus, they are empirical, rather than being based on a stochastic ground-motion model. The stochastic model predictions of Atkinson and Boore (1995) are used at larger magnitudes (M > 4), however, to ensure reasonable values over a broad range of magnitudes (2 to 6).The new relationships are used to estimate ground-motion parameters for ShakeMaps in Ontario. The ShakeMap program combines predicted ground-motion values with recorded ground-motion values to produce an interpolated map of ground-motion amplitudes. It is essential that the predicted ground-motion values be consistent with recorded values in order to generate reliable ShakeMaps. We found that with our new predictive relations, we obtain ground-motion estimates that closely resemble the recorded ground motions for the small events (2 < M < 4) that occur relatively frequently in eastern North America and are often felt. Thus we recommend the use of our predictive relations for ShakeMap applications in southeastern Canada and the northeastern United States. They are not intended for engineering predictions for large rare earthquakes (M > 6). You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».