MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2048162410 · doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0339-8

New Approaches to Allograft Transplantation: Editorial Comment

2008· article· en· W2048162410 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hans Burchardt

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTransplantationSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Symposium, held in Vancouver, B.C. in October 2007, was the fifth invitational meeting since 1993. These Symposia have reflected the Foundation’s commitment to the science of allografts and bioconstructs. This 5th International Symposium celebrated the Foundation’s 20th year and recognized the founders’ dreams for a viable institution capable of furthering scientific advances in transplantation. Through the support of internal and external research, the ultimate goal has been to advance the medical treatment of patients. Dr. J. Buckwalter of the University of Iowa and Dr. M. Bolander of the Mayo Clinic were the architects and co-chairs for this international meeting. In addition to being members of the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (MTF) Board of Directors, these individuals are well-known, both nationally and internationally, as advocates of scientific research. At the opening of the Symposium, Dr. William F. Enneking and Dr. V. Frankel were formally acknowledged as the two founding members of MTF who have provided key stewardship since its inception in 1987. Both Drs. Enneking and Frankel are recognized nationally and internationally as leaders in the fields of orthopaedics, education, and research. Their vision prompted the development of a peer-review grant program that encouraged young investigators to enter today’s competitive research environment. More than a grant program, this program also emphasized presentation and publication. Since 1993, the MTF grant program has awarded over $20 million for allograft and bioconstruct research to men and women representing more than 112 institutions. The five International Symposia are landmarks of this program. The 5th Symposium is of even greater importance since 32 of the 40 presentations were recipients of awards within the last seven years. The Symposium’s three sessions emphasized cartilage, soft tissue, and bone transplantation. The 40 presentations represented the work of researchers from Europe, South America, Canada, and the United States. Each session was characterized by the intermixture of basic science, tissue banking safety, or the technological improvements being explored with hard and soft tissue engineering. Twenty-three manuscripts were submitted for publication, with the 20 published here best representing the entire spectrum of the Symposium. The articles in CORR have been reordered from the original presentation to better group the topics of tissue transplantation. Thus, the reader will first encounter clinical work, such as the use of transplants in children, followed by research with autologous cartilage cell transplants in a synthetic matrix. New clinical information is also presented on the characteristics of graft failure in allografts, and the lack of immunogenic consequences to tissue transplants. The futuristic topics in tissue transplantation are of unusual interest to both professionals and the lay public. Three articles emphasize the modification of natural remodeling characteristics usually associated with transplants to enhance incorporation. Another focuses on interference with the first phase of cortical bone remodeling, namely resorption. The question remains: Does modifying the resorptive phase allow for normal incorporation and biomechanical properties of the transplants? The hard and soft tissue engineering field is the forerunner of change in today’s transplantation research. Therefore, the articles on growth factors, the use of stem cells, nano meshes and microspheres are of particular interest. This modern engineering includes newer technologies capable of assessing biological materials in vivo using a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to quantify vascularity, or the testing of transplant materials in an in vivo bioreactor. It seems we have an obligation to provide continuing support to evaluate transplants. Decisions must be made regarding their success in relation to the use of synthetics, which seem to emerge from many directions. It is possible the future of tissue transplants will demonstrate a greater merging with synthetics and pharmaceuticals, whereby transplants will act as carriers of future technologies. Undoubtedly, research in the next 5 decades will dazzle us even more than the scientific changes we have witnessed in the past 50 years. The most surprising advances will likely come from the direction that research takes unexpectedly by incorporating newer technologies. The recognition in the 60’s and 70’s that musculoskeletal tissue transplantation could be performed with relative immunological impunity led to tissue banking. The maturing of the newest experimental advances will lead to twists and turns not yet comprehended. I thank all of the investigators for their contributions to the Symposium. The publication process has become more detailed and exacting, and these changes reflect the greater expectations demanded from all of us to better serve the medical needs of the public. Finally, I want to express to all of you involved in the Symposium and the publication, my appreciation for your efforts and my gratitude for your dedicated support.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,238
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,788

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,383
Tête enseignante GPT0,444
Écart entre enseignants0,061 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchMême sujetOrgan and Tissue Transplantation ResearchTravaux en français237 207