Latent mixed Markov modelling of smoking transitions using Monte Carlo bootstrapping
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It has been established that measures and reports of smoking behaviours are subject to substantial measurement errors. Thus, the manifest Markov model which does not consider measurement error in observed responses may not be adequate to mathematically model changes in adolescent smoking behaviour over time. For this purpose we fit several Mixed Markov Latent Class (MMLC) models using data sets from two longitudinal panel studies--the third Waterloo Smoking Prevention study and the UWO smoking study, which have varying numbers of measurements on adolescent smoking behaviour. However, the conventional statistics used for testing goodness of fit of these models do not follow the theoretical chi-square distribution when there is data sparsity. The two data sets analysed had varying degrees of sparsity. This problem can be solved by estimating the proper distribution of fit measures using Monte Carlo bootstrap simulation. In this study, we showed that incorporating response uncertainty in smoking behaviour significantly improved the fit of a single Markov chain model. However, the single chain latent Markov model did not adequately fit the two data sets indicating that the smoking process was heterogeneous with regard to latent Markov chains. It was found that a higher percentage of students (except for never smokers) changed their smoking behaviours over time at the manifest level compared to the latent or true level. The smoking process generally accelerated with time. The students had a tendency to underreport their smoking behaviours while response uncertainty was estimated to be considerably less for the Waterloo smoking study which adopted the 'bogus pipeline' method for reducing measurement error while the UWO study did not. For the two-chain latent mixed Markov models, incorporating a 'stayer' chain to an unrestricted Markov chain led to a significant improvement in model fit for the UWO study only. For both data sets, the assumption for the existence of an independence chain did not lead to significant improvement in model fit. The unrestricted two-chain latent mixed Markov model led to a significant improvement of model fit compared to a simple latent Markov model, but this model was overparameterized when the latent transition probabilities and/or response probabilities were assumed nonstationary. For the other models, the manifest/latent transition probabilities and response probabilities (for the four-wave Waterloo study only) were tested to be nonstationary for both data sets.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».