MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2049091936 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2006.0001

The Reconstruction of Warriors: Archibald McIndoe, the Royal Air Force, and the Guinea Pig Club (review)

2006· article· en· W2049091936 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edgar Jones

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Military History · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBattleClubMedicineHistoryAncient historySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Reconstruction of Warriors: Archibald McIndoe, the Royal Air Force, and the Guinea Pig Club Edgar Jones The Reconstruction of Warriors: Archibald McIndoe, the Royal Air Force, and the Guinea Pig Club. By E. R. Mayhew. Mechanicsburg, Pa.: Stackpole Books, 2004. ISBN 1-85367-610-1. Photographs. Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. 239. $34.95. This is a carefully researched and well-written analysis of how plastic surgeon Archibald McIndoe turned East Grinstead Cottage Hospital into a centre of excellence for the treatment of burns during the Second World War. As a civilian consultant to the Royal Air Force, the charismatic McIndoe was referred increasing numbers of horribly burned pilots from the Battle of Britain. In a short time he reversed medical orthodoxy and built up an impressive team of doctors and nurses, training juniors who then practised elsewhere in the U.K. Mayhew documents how he successfully campaigned [End Page 262] against coagulation therapy (the use of tannic acid to seal burned tissue) and returned to more labour intensive methods involving saline baths, gauze dressings and Vaseline jelly to promote both healing and the creation of a suitable grafting surface. The preeminence achieved by McIndoe echoed that of his uncle Harold Gillies who had treated soldiers mutilated by shellfire at the Queen's Hospital, Sidcup, during the First World War. Driven by the need to return airmen to some form of purposeful life, this study shows how war accelerated the techniques of plastic surgery, though possibly to the detriment of other hospitals or disciplines denied such resources; it also shows the power of specialisation. It is perhaps more than a coincidence that each World War produced in the U.K. a plastic surgeon of determination, independence of thought, and dedication. Indeed, McIndoe, Gillies, and David Charters (who accomplished similar medical miracles in a German POW camp) all had an ambivalent view towards authority and almost, of necessity, had dominant personalities. However, this is far from being just a medical history, and the aviation context in which aircrew fought and became casualties is explored. In 1939, the Air Ministry decided against installing self-sealing tanks in Hurricane and Spitfire fighter aircraft because of the additional weight and consequent loss of fuel capacity, thereby reducing its ability to engage the enemy. This policy inevitably meant that pilots would be horribly burned as the main tank in the Spitfire was located behind the engine and in front of the control panel. The calculation had perhaps failed to account for the time it took for burned patients to recover and the general effect on the morale of aircrew who knew that they were exposed to such frightening risks. Mayhew destroys the popular myth that burned aircrew were largely fighter pilots from the Battle of Britain and demonstrates that from 1941 onwards the vast majority were bomber crew. By the end of the war, for example, 80 per cent of the Guinea Pig Club had served in bombers. Although the Canadian Wing at East Grinstead is carefully analysed, no mention is made of the therapeutic regime practised by the American Eighth Air Force engaged in daylight raids over Germany. Although important clues are given, there is little overt analysis of the psychology of either aircrew or the medical staff who nursed them. It is difficult to imagine an injury more designed to cause psychiatric trauma than severe burns to the face and hands. It would have been interesting to know how many, if any, of these pilots became depressed or even suicidal and whether the RAF deployed liaison psychiatrists to East Grinstead. The Guinea Pig Club and its magazine undoubtedly provided an essential comradeship and a sense of shared adversity, while McIndoe's own personality served as an inspiration, stating in 1958 that "throughout the surgical period and for long after it the patient will lean heavily on the surgeon for mental support, for hope and encouragement." The part played by the citizens of East Grinstead in creating an environment in which horribly disfigured airmen could begin to adjust to their wounds and reintroduce themselves to society outside a hospital ward is well described. This open-minded [End Page 263] approach contrasted...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,048

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Military HistoryMême sujetHistory of Medical PracticeTravaux en français237 207