MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2049150026 · doi:10.1093/icb/icl055

Review of Sensation and Perception. Jeremy M. Wolfe et al

2007· article· en· W2049150026 sur OpenAlexaff
James T. Enns

Notice bibliographique

RevueIntegrative and Comparative Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSensationPerceptionPsychologyNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Jeremy Wolfe, a professor at Harvard and team leader on this multiauthored introduction to human sensation and perception, is best known in his research community for the colorful way in which he delivers lectures at scholarly conferences. It is not unusual for the audience at one of his sessions to swell to standing room only immediately before he makes his presentation and then to dissipate again shortly thereafter. Many in the audience are not even deeply interested in the details of his topic. Yet they come because what they have learned to expect from Professor Wolfe is a presentation that is colorful, to the point, and above all entertaining. As one of the world's top researchers in the area of human visual attention, Jeremy Wolfe's presentations are also filled with substance. His day-to-day work encompasses the important and yet largely still unanswered questions of how we know the meaning of an object when we see it and how the human brain copes with an overload of sensory information. He is famous for starting controversies among his colleagues and sometimes even entirely new lines of research by simply asking direct questions about the assumptions that they and others take for granted. In Sensation and Perception, Professor Wolfe has brought both of his formidable sets of talents—namely, skilled communication and sharp thinking—to bear on the problem of how to tell undergraduate students about the world of human sensory systems and perceptual experience. Two features will immediately strike anyone familiar with previous textbooks in this area as distinctive. First, the text is interspersed, cover to cover, with colorful illustrations. This is a first for this area. Previously, textbook publishers in the behavioral and life sciences have only been willing to spend the resources necessary for a full color presentation on very large enrollment courses such as Introduction to Biology or Psychology. Among the only in-depth area survey textbooks previously given a similar treatment have been Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology. Sensation and Perception was thought to be too small a market to be worth the effort. But to what extent has this been a self-fulfilling prophecy, as many instructors like to argue? Many of them have said enrollments are lower, in part, because the subject matter in perception did not jump off the page as readily for students. Wolfe's text will now let the necessary experiment be run in the natural world. I'm sure there are many instructors who will welcome this text for that reason alone. For the first time they will be fully assisted by a textbook that helps them give life to material they already felt passionately about. A second distinctive feature is evident on the cover. There are a total of seven coauthors on this text, and each one of them is a leading researcher in a sensory subsystem, ranging from vision and audition to touch, smell, and taste. As a result, each of the chapters, while necessarily covering the familiar territory of a survey textbook, has plenty of freshness in its look and feel. This is not the tired rehashing of material traditionally found in many perception textbooks. Each chapter refers to contemporary research, and the descriptions of current controversies have a contemporary ring to them. Also to their credit, the Wolfe team has managed to speak in a fairly unified voice. There are inevitable slips, but readers should not underestimate the difficulty of smoothing the text when seven egos and distinctive writing styles are in play. I can't be sure, of course, but I think I can hear the anecdotes in Professor Wolfe's voice in each chapter. As an example of this, consider the way that the problem of selective visual attention is introduced in chapter 8. It begins by acknowledging that the student reader is likely very busy and then offers a simple idea: “Why not read two books at the same time?” The obvious problem of the limited visual acuity of the eye is first acknowledged and then overcome with a demonstration the students can try for themselves, involving two lines of large text that pose no acuity problems. Even with the acuity problem solved, readers will find that only one event or object (in this case, one line of text) can be entertained in consciousness at a time. This opens the door to describing the rich world of modern research on the mental limitations in our ability to drive and hold phone conversations at the same time and to search for loved ones in an airport. In chapter 14 on taste, there is an equally engaging discussion of the genetic basis of how taste sensitivity varies in the population, with some of us being “supertasters,” and therefore highly sensitive to certain trace chemicals in food, while the rest of us are “nontasters” and thus never quite certain what all the fuss is about. The single greatest strength of this textbook lies in its accessibility to a wide audience of readers interested in an introduction to the study of human sensory systems. This had been accomplished by (in addition to the superbly crafted color figures already mentioned) largely stripping the text of all scholarly references. When experimental results are described in order to establish a point, only very generic tones and descriptions are given. This means that in order to use this textbook for an upper-level course or a small-enrollment course in which research is the focus, an instructor will want to supplement it with a more rigorous book or with readings from primary sources. The book is also surprisingly short for a treatment of all five senses, coming in at just over 400 pages. Whether this represents strength or weakness will depend on your perspective. Students and many professors will welcome the brevity because it contributes to the overall accessibility of the material, but there will also be research-oriented teachers who are disappointed that their favorite topics are not covered. Speaking personally, I was surprised to find that visual object recognition, visual imagery, and the scientific study of consciousness were almost entirely absent in the treatment. But I can also imagine the hard choices that had to be made to keep the book within its page limits. When it comes to the so-called minor senses of touch, smell, and taste, I think it is safe to say that this is the most up-to-date introduction currently available. No competing textbook comes close to being as current or as well structured in its presentation of these sensory systems and their function. I expect that students will enjoy the companion Web site to this text (www.sinauer.com/wolfe/) and that instructors will welcome the accompanying Instructor's Resource CD (ISBN 0-87893-939-3), which includes an Instructor's Manual to help in course development and a Test Bank to aid in student assessment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,034

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0020,004
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,114
Tête enseignante GPT0,355
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueIntegrative and Comparative BiologyMême sujetMuseums and Cultural HeritageTravaux en français237 207