MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2050047473 · doi:10.1108/01445151311306645

Optimization of slicing direction in laminated tooling for volume deviation reduction

2013· article· en· W2050047473 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAssembly Automation · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueManufacturing Process and Optimization
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSlicingVolume (thermodynamics)Reduction (mathematics)MachiningComputer scienceCADSurface (topology)Engineering drawingMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringMathematicsGeometryPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Purpose Due to an uncertainty between actual model and assembled slices, there is always an extra material on assembled slices in laminated tooling. Therefore, a post processing, usually CNC machining, is required to remove this extra material and reach the near net shape surface for final product. One of the issues in laminated tooling is to minimize the amount of this extra material and reduce the cost of the post processing. Direction of slicing is an important parameter in this issue. This research aims to introduce a method to find the best slicing direction based on CAD model surface geometry and minimize the amount of the extra material in the assembled slices. Researches on the best slicing direction investigation so far were mostly based on the extra volume calculation for a number of candidate directions. Since the time needed for the extra volume calculation is proportionally high, the number of candidate directions to be investigated was usually limited, whereas, in the proposed method, the best slicing direction is found based on CAD model surface geometry and there is no need to find the actual amount of the extra volume. Moreover, the suggested method is developed to the cases where having more than one slicing direction is desirable for more reduction in the amount of the extra volume. The proposed optimization method can be used to find the best slicing direction in laminated tooling. Moreover, the ability to suggest multiple slicing directions can provide more reduction for the amount of the extra material. However, the number of candidate directions in the case of multiple slicing directions is limited due to joining problems in laminated tooling. Design/methodology/approach The investigation is based on the situation of normal vectors on CAD model surface. The CAD model surface is considered as a combination of planar tiles and all normal vectors of these tiles are considered as the candidate directions. This provides a number of candidates that can cover almost all possible slicing directions. The best slicing direction is then found by estimating the amount of the extra material produced on the tiles by each normal vector. Findings The proposed method applied to some examples. The case studies included the simple predictable models to qualify the reliability of the proposed method. Also more applicable examples were provided to show how the suggested method acts in real cases. Research limitations/implications The proposed method can be applied to each and every CAD model. Therefore, there is no limitation with regard to the type of model which can be investigated by the proposed method. However, there is limitation on the number of times the building direction can be changed in laminated tooling. Practical implications The proposed method can be employed to reduce the post processing time in laminated tooling. Originality/value Following the prior study researchers conducted in optimization of laminated dies, another parameter, slicing direction, is considered in this research. This brings a new approach on laminated dies optimization to reduce the production cost.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,527
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,475

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle