Upscaling Using a Non-Uniform Coarsened Grid With Optimum Power Average
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Geostatistical modeling techniques are capable of generating high-resolution reservoir models. Since a limited amount of information is available to model the reservoir, geological uncertainty is represented through a suite of equally probable models. Unfortunately, these high-resolution models are often too large to process through numerical flow simulators. Upscaling methods are required that reduce the size of detailed models while preserving the important geological characteristics of the reservoir. Most upscaling methods currently in vogue work with uniform grids. A new upscaling approach based on non-uniform coarsening with optimum power average is presented. The proposed algorithm identifies likely high connectivity regions using streamline simulations, then constructs a non-uniform coarse-scale grid preserving the areas with probable high connectivity and assign equivalent permeability to the coarse grid blocks using an optimum power average technique. The power average exponent is calibrated using the data from a series of single-phase flow simulations. Introduction Upscaling is a procedure that transforms a detailed geological model to a coarse grid simulation model such that the flow behaviour in the two systems is similar. Upscaling is required because fine-scale flow simulation of multiple geostatistical realizations can be CPU (computer processing unit) expensive. Any upscaling procedure involves basically two steps:gridding, to define the new coarse blocks, andaveraging or estimation of properties, to preserve the local geologic details. Numerous upscaling methods have been reported in the literature(1). Nevertheless, efficient and accurate estimation of equivalent rock properties of coarse-scale from geological data at fine-scale remains an active area of research. The simplest numerical procedure for the determination of equivalent permeability involves the solution of the Laplace equation for pressure within the reservoir domain, subject to constant pressure gradient in the direction of flow and no flux perpendicular to it. The limitation of these conditions is that the cross terms of the K tensor (Kxy and Kyx in 2D systems) cannot be determined. Despite this limitation, the approach continues to be used assuming that the diagonal terms of K tensor that are computed are correct and the cross-terms are not important. This is true if the coordinate's direction (i.e. x and y) coincides with the principal directions of the effective permeability tensor. Unfortunately this is not usually the case or known a priori and it can change from one location to another. To overcome this limitation, Durlofsky(2) presented a numerical procedure for the determination of equivalent grid block permeability tensors. The method entails solution of the fine-scale pressure equation, subject to periodic boundary conditions. Symmetric, positive definite equivalent permeability tensors are obtained. A numerical approach to obtain a full tensor consists of using linear boundary conditions(3,4). A pressure gradient is imposed in the flow direction and a linear pressure profile is enforced on the two other opposite faces. This variation results in a non-symmetrical permeability tensor taking into account the cross-flow term. Despite improved representation of flow in heterogeneous media using a permeability tensor, the pressure solver techniques employ approximations such as single-phase flow and simplified boundary conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle