MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2050729966 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0234

Saskatchewan: A New History (review)

2009· article· en· W2050729966 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
John Herd Thompson

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWrightContext (archaeology)CommonwealthMetisHistoryIndependence (probability theory)ScholarshipPower (physics)Political scienceLawArt historyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Saskatchewan: A New History John Herd Thompson Saskatchewan: A New History. Bill Waiser. Calgary: Fitzhenry & Whiteside, 2006. Pp. 608, $49.95 When the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (ccf) won power in Saskatchewan in 1944, among its priorities was to make the province’s history accessible to popular and scholarly audiences. In 1945 it established the Saskatchewan Archives Board, with offices astutely located both in Regina and on the campus of the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon. In 1948 the Board published the first issue of Saskatchewan History. Historical scholarship built on this intellectual infrastructure and continued to receive taxpayer support. In 1955 the provincial Golden Jubilee Committee sponsored Saskatchewan: The History of a Province, written by Jim F.C. Wright with the assistance of a team of researchers. For the province’s Diamond Jubilee in 1980 the Archives [End Page 764] Board commissioned John H. Archer to create Saskatchewan: A History, aided as Wright had been with a research team. Both Wright and Archer worked with complete interpretive independence. Each book in its context was a commendable achievement. But each volume tells us as much about the Saskatchewan in which it was written as it does about Saskatchewan’s past. Wright’s heroes were homesteaders. The province’s greatest achievement was ‘becoming homogenous without . . . compulsion,’ despite ‘a variegated populace’ that was less than half ‘Anglo-Saxon.’ To Wright in 1955, variegated meant Europeans from outside the British Isles; Metis and Indians literally disappeared after page ninety-seven of the 281-page narrative. In 1980 Archer accepted as given a much broader ‘concept of multiculturalism’ that with ‘maturing idealism’ could encompass all provincial citizens. But because he wrote while Saskatchewan fought with Ottawa over the division of the spoils of potash and petroleum development, Archer foregrounded contemporary regional conflict and sometimes projected it backwards into history. Bill Waiser’s Saskatchewan: A New History shares much with its two predecessors in the blueprint of its creation. Commissioned to mark the province’s 2005 centenary, the project had support from the University of Saskatchewan and the provincial government. In a marked departure from Wright and Archer, Waiser also had support from three federal government agencies. Like Wright and Archer, Waiser led a team of researchers, and like them he had complete control of ‘how the history of the province was handled.’ But Waiser has handled that history much more successfully than Wright or Archer could have imagined. He has crafted a flowing narrative that can enthrall an elusive popular reader and yet synthesizes and cites enough academic scholarship to satisfy a cranky pedant like this reviewer. Waiser builds his opening chapter, ‘The Banner Province,’ around 4 September 1905, Inauguration Day for the new province, and uses the ceremony to set Saskatchewan into its Canadian and British Empire contexts. Waiser uses other ceremonies – the 1912 opening of the Legislative Building, the 1927 Diamond Jubilee, the 1939 Royal Tour – equally dexterously to launch or conclude several of his twenty-one chapters. Each chapter title quotes a primary source. Although the subjects of individual chapters aren’t at first obvious, Waiser introduces each chapter succinctly and locates the quotation; once a reader figures out his system, it adds further to the pleasure of the book. Because Waiser combines chronological and thematic organization, a half-dozen of his chapters could stand alone as readings for university history classes. As but three examples, ‘Dead Cows Hanging,’ ‘Land [End Page 765] I Can Own,’ and ‘A Very Nice Fairy Tale’ would introduce cattle ranching, homesteading, and the wheat economy more effectively and better than any book chapter or journal article I’ve yet discovered. Two of many commendable characteristics of Saskatchewan: A New History deserve particular praise. After opening with the creation of the provincial state in 1905, Waiser flashes back to ‘Another Country Altogether,’ an outstanding chapter on Native peoples in northern Saskatchewan. But Indians and Metis are not confined within individual chapters but instead are integrated into every chapter of the book as full-fledged historical actors. Although their resistance to Euro- Canadian encroachments was too often unsuccessful, Native peoples nonetheless always have agency in Waiser’s prose. ‘Much like western farmers,’ he writes in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,838
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,321

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0060,012
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0460,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical ReviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207