MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2050782673 · doi:10.1353/utq.2005.0232

At Odds: Gambling and Canadians, 1919-1969 (review)

2004· article· en· W2050782673 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Robert Wardhaugh

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOddsRevenueGovernment (linguistics)Consumption (sociology)SociologyPolitical scienceEconomicsSocial scienceFinanceMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: At Odds: Gambling and Canadians, 1919–1969 Robert Wardhaugh (bio) Suzanne Morton. At Odds: Gambling and Canadians, 1919–1969 University of Toronto Press. xi, 272. $60.00, $24.95 Gambling pervades Canada today. Lotteries, games of chance, sports-betting, and fund-raising enterprises are remarkably widespread. Gambling has undergone a transformation, notes Suzanne Morton in her new book, At Odds: Gambling and Canadians, 1919-1969, 'from a stigmatized minor vice to an acceptable activity regarded as appropriate and perhaps necessary to fund the Canadian welfare state.' Yet, gambling remains a contentious issue forCanadian society. Debates swirl around the social costs and responsibilities of addictive gambling, the question of municipal referendums on building casinos in communities, and the issues of locating [End Page 608] and controlling casinos on First Nations Reserves. But one of the most central and most ambivalent issues remains the role of government in regulating and, even more specifically, profiting from gambling. Provincial governments have come to rely so heavily on gambling revenues that officials will not even contemplate curtailing the industry. Instead, it is assumed that the revenue is so essential that there now cannot even be a debateabout the role of government. The focus, rather, is diverted towards using an insignificant amount of this revenue to offer token assistance to victims and addicts. This provocative, engaging, and well-researched book offers an interpretation of the history of gambling in Canada, from the end of the First World War to its legalization in1969.As Morton points out, times have certainly changed (or rather the level of ambivalence towards gambling has significantly increased). 'Until 1969,' Morton observes, 'virtually all forms of public gambling were illegal in Canada; only a generation ago, what we take for granted today was a source of public debate and moral ambivalence.' Legalization occurred under the peculiar circumstances of an omnibus reform bill that extensively revised the Criminal Code by liberalizing government policy on such issues as abortion, homosexuality, birth control, divorce, and gambling. By examining the changing reactions of Canadians to gambling and gambling legislation, Morton analyses and seeks to explain the shifting attitudes, what she views as a contrast of libertarian and moral relativism with pragmatic utilitarianism. Morton argues that attitudes towards gambling in fact reflected the 'big' issues of society, such as work, property, democracy, gender, religion, governance, and definitions of community. Indeed, she claims, 'the simple narrative description of this process belies the fact that cultural contradictions surround the entire process.' As a predominantly Protestant country in 1919, Canada shared the approach towards gambling with other Protestant societies, one that ambivalently blended unofficial toleration with official condemnation. At issue was not simply gambling but rather how it related to work, property, family, and faith. Its regulation exposed cultural contradictions about understandings and definitions of capitalism, gender roles, and community. Gambling could be considered positive and state-sanctioned or criminal, depending on the participants, their motivation, and where proceeds were going. The 'respectability' of gambling was situational, based on the class, race, and gender of the participants. But, over the course of the twentieth century, the construction of gambling as deviant behaviour became increasingly difficult to maintain with the decline of 'old Victorian Canada,' as represented by the Anglo-Celtic, Protestant middle class and its traditional institutions such as churches and patriarchal control: 'The secularization of charity and expanding expectations of the state opened the door for the rationalization [End Page 609] of government-operated gambling as the state assumed the traditional role of charitable fundraising.' Morton injects the 'simple narrative' with class, gender, and ethnic analysis. She correctly points out that social 'vices' have moral, spatial, and political dimensions. Gambling was viewed as a predominantly male activity, but women also gambled, and a gendered construction was built around the activity that reinforced patriarchal values. Morton also argues that the understanding of vice in Victorian Canada reflected Judaeo-Christian tenets, especially the dominant Protestant culture. Here, she is successful at placing the shifting attitudes and reactions within the structure of ethnic and cultural hegemony. The book is filled with wonderful analytical conclusions, but the reader is often left wanting more substantive discussions to sustain the conclusions . Whereas Morton provides...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,443
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,892

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→