MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2051716627 · doi:10.2523/iptc-16940-ms

Sand Production Prediction Analysis of Heterogeneous Reservoirs for Sand Control and Optimal Well Completion Design

2013· article· en· W2051716627 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensConocoPhillips (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesConocoPhillips
Mots-clésDrawdown (hydrology)Completion (oil and gas wells)Petroleum engineeringSubmarine pipelinePermeability (electromagnetism)Production rateProduction (economics)Geotechnical engineeringReservoir engineeringGeologyEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringEngineeringAquiferProcess engineeringGroundwater

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract This paper provides our approach to making sand production and sand rate prediction analysis for a gas and gas condensate field located offshore in the South Natuna Sea. Since the reservoirs are very heterogeneous and containing four major layers or producing intervals, the prediction of their sanding potential becomes more complex and thus requires a more elaborate and sound judgment to make a reasonable assessment. The key objective of this evaluation and sand rate prediction is to come up with an optimal plan for well completion design and providing effective sand control throughout the life of such multiple reservoirs. Sand production due to the failure of reservoir formation resulting from pressure depletion and drawdown pressure often causes significant loss in well production, facility damage, and can ultimately lead to shut-in of the well after continuous sanding-up. It is most worthwhile if we are able to predict the sanding potential of any given reservoir during continuous well production under certain completion design. Our ability to reliably predict such sanding potential and sand production rate can help generate an optimum design for well completion by running a series of computer simulations for various design scenarios. Our study showed that if the reservoir rock strength and its variation along the depth were measured for each well, the conditions that induce sand production problem for each interval could be predicted. The most important factors contributing to sanding problems were the rock strength, flowing bottom-hole pressure, reservoir pressure, in-situ stresses, and flow rate. Therefore, if permeability distribution and oil/gas and water saturations were measured for each well in addition to the rock strength, the best completion method to reduce sand problems without significantly decreasing oil or gas production can be identified without going through the costly trial-and-error selection method in the actual field. A 3D non-linear elastic-plastic finite element model incorporated with fluid-flow module for reservoir component has been effectively used for such numerical simulations. The results of this investigation conclude the following key points for optimal and effective well completion design:there are sporadic weak sands found in all four major intervals of the reservoirs and it's not possible to use a selective perforation scheme for this field;the average sand rate as predicted is too high so that at least half of the high sand producers will require an installation of some downhole sand control measures;The installation of a sand rate detection device at around the flow-line elbows is necessary and prudent;It is necessary to monitor the amount of sand production using equipments such as sand traps, sand rate measurement devices, and erosion coupons for better protection or timely replacement of the critical lines and flow pipes;produce the reservoir with smooth reduction of reservoir pressure by limiting the drawdown pressure to be 250 psi or smaller in order to reduce the sand rate by 50–75%.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,418
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,565

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle