MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2051869590 · doi:10.1177/1715163514546107

Going it on their own

2014· article· en· W2051869590 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ross T. Tsuyuki

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDispensaryPharmacyNewspaperPopulationHealth careSignageMedicinePharmacistNursingPublic relationsFamily medicineSociologyBusinessPolitical scienceMedia studiesAdvertising

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In June I Visited Reid McDonald and Anita Cumbleton, who have just opened Sunset Ridge Pharmacy in a new subdivision in the north part of Cochrane, Alberta (population 21,000), about 35 minutes northwest of Calgary. As you can see from the photo, they are still awaiting their signage. I would describe the design of their clinic as “patient-focused.” Central to this are 2 patient examination rooms (see photo below; left of center). There is only a very small dispensary and a small selection of OTC products (Reid and Anita have deliberately avoided alternative and unproven therapies). This is a pharmacy designed for patient care. Indeed, their business model is based on billing Alberta Health for their clinical services. So far, the major challenges have been getting their pharmacy known (this is a very new subdivision, not completed yet) and meeting local physicians and other health care providers. Their grand opening in the beginning of July was very successful and included fundraising for a local charity, air time on the local radio station and a newspaper article.1 Anita and Reid have met with the leadership of the local Primary Care Network. Not surprisingly, the physicians wanted to know what Anita and Reid “were going to do to their patients” and didn’t appreciate the need for chronic care management and education (the physicians think they already provide those services for everyone). However, the physicians acknowledged that Anita and Reid were the first pharmacists to approach them about collaboration, and the two have scheduled a follow-up meeting with some of the physicians. Interestingly, Reid and Anita have been “visited” surreptitiously by other pharmacists in the area, none of whom have had the professional courtesy to introduce themselves. This is a young couple who have taken a courageous step forward to realize their vision of patient care. We all wish them well. Our other new practitioner, Bryan Gray, recently received the Canadian Pharmacists Association New Practitioner Award.2 Bryan embodies the very spirit of the award—showing exemplary courage and commitment to patient care and the profession. Back home in Thunder Bay, Bryan and his staff have been busy. Since establishing River Terrace Medical Pharmacy in late February, Bryan and his staff have seen tremendous growth. He says, “As an independent pharmacy, our competitive edge is service.” He is confident that the pharmacy is able to provide that higher level of service to patients. Bryan gives much of the credit to his team of technicians and pharmacists: Laura Bron (pharmacist), Mehgan Woods (technician), Vikki Kinsman (technician) and Janet Proctor (pharmacist). Some new programs that they are starting include a discrete methadone service, point-of-care anticoagulation service, medication synchronization (synchronizing refills for chronic medications) and preparation for this fall’s flu season. Check out their website: www.RTPharmacy.com. Bryan recently received his designation as a Certified Diabetes Educator. He also remarks that his MBA courses at Lakehead University have helped a lot, especially in terms of marketing, human resources, accounting and organizational behavior. These are big steps for these new practitioners. The words and phrases that come to mind are courage, vision, focus on patient care, commitment, professionalism and unwillingness to accept the status quo. We need more of this from our profession.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,454
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,779

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,003
Communication savante0,0120,010
Science ouverte0,0020,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,013
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4540,318

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,114
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada→Même sujetPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→