MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2051923627 · doi:10.4043/19566-ms

Paraffin Cleanout in a Single Subsea Flowline Environment: Glycol to Blame?

2008· article· en· W2051923627 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOffshore Technology Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Établissements canadiensNalco (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSubseaEthylene glycolHydrateXyleneClathrate hydratePetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceWaste managementChemical engineeringChromatographyMaterials scienceChemistryGeologyOrganic chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Paraffin deposition was found in the RedHawk #2 subsea flowline and was successfully removed using a xylene slug swept by produced gas from the well. Testing indicated that the problem resulted from the interaction between glycol and produced condensate. Overtreatment with glycol and low produced water volumes contributed to the precipitation of paraffin and eventual plugging of the flowline. The objective of this procedure was to clear the restriction by pumping a slug of xylene into the flowline and producing the well to carry the solids to surface. Glycol can react negatively with the condensate in some dry gas wells, resulting in paraffin precipitation. When there is sufficient water present to mix with the glycol the problem does not occur, however a lack of water causes the glycol to react with the condensate and form paraffin. Clearing the restriction would eliminate a pressure drop in the flowline, thus allowing the well to produce at optimal rate and prolonging the well's life. All work was performed from the host spar facility using temporary separation equipment and platform methanol pumps. The RedHawk flowline restriction was successfully removed using two 25 bbl xylene slugs which were swept from the flowline with produced gas from the well. With the restriction removed, 982 psi of frictional loss was regained and the well was returned to optimal production. The deposition appears to be reoccurring, although at a much slower rate than before. However, any further reduction in glycol usage would not guarantee effective hydrate inhibition. Changing hydrate inhibitors is impractical due to platform equipment and annual cleanouts are a more cost effective option. It is quickly becoming critical to develop means of cleaning single flowline systems with highly efficient and low cost methods. By understanding new problems that arise and putting new solutions into practice operators can extend the life of some wells and avoid significant downtime and workover costs. Introduction RedHawk is an Anadarko Petroleum Corporation operated cell spar located in 5300' of water in Garden Banks Block 876, about 177 miles southeast of Cameron, LA in the Gulf of Mexico. Devon Energy Corporation is a 50% working interest partner in the RedHawk field. The platform consists of two dry gas subsea tie-back wells, shown in figure 1, that are treated with recycled MEG via RedHawk's Glycol Reclamation Unit (GRU) for hydrate inhibition. As the GB 877 #2 well's chokes were opened to maintain the target rate of 75 MMCFD, it became apparent that the chokes were no longer controlling the flow from the well but rather some other restriction in the flowline (see figure 2). Modeling and testing showed that there was a restriction in the flowline causing a pressure loss and limiting the production rate of the well. The restriction was initially thought to be the result of fluids from the initial completion cleanup or from a preexisting blockage that occurred during installation of the flowline.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,334
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,185
Écart entre enseignants0,167 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle